Also gutsy to shorten your batting lineup, after being rolled for 95 and 111.Congrats SA. Brave, skilled, and intelligent.
Gutsy call on selecting the 12 and batting 1st, then just played good, hard test cricket....
Also gutsy to shorten your batting lineup, after being rolled for 95 and 111.Congrats SA. Brave, skilled, and intelligent.
Gutsy call on selecting the 12 and batting 1st, then just played good, hard test cricket....
Great effort for them to stick in there and get away with a drawn series in both series this home summer. They're consistently more than the sum of their parts.Congrats NZ on a well faught drawn series. Love how this bunch never gives up and punches above its weight.
See now that's the attitude I like, nz getting by on team spirit and a helpfull schedule.Congrats NZ on a well faught drawn series. Love how this bunch never gives up and punches above its weight.
Very unusual for us to play two games at the same ground too.Can we stop this 'SA played a spinner, they're smarter therefore won' BS please?
Ajaz was injured. Ravindra was next cab off the rank and he is a part-timer, and it's very likely he would have played ahead of CdG if he had played. Somerville wouldn't have made a lick of difference and your other option is Santner. Maharaj is a great bowler and SA were right to pick him, but we picked the best XI to win that game. And we performed badly, and lost. All this revisionist BS about a same-same attack, when we had a left armer, a 6 foot 10 bounce bowler and two swing bowlers.
Yeah I can’t stand all of this ‘our players actually suck’ and ‘what could you expect from that attack’ BS when talking about a team we know are capable of better. Can we please just focus on the fact that these capable players played like dicks and that’s not ok.Can we stop this 'SA played a spinner, they're smarter therefore won' BS please?
Ajaz was injured. Ravindra was next cab off the rank and he is a part-timer, and it's very likely he would have played ahead of CdG if he had played. Somerville wouldn't have made a lick of difference and your other option is Santner. Maharaj is a great bowler and SA were right to pick him, but we picked the best XI to win that game. And we performed badly, and lost. All this revisionist BS about a same-same attack, when we had a left armer, a 6 foot 10 bounce bowler and two swing bowlers.
yeah there are plenty of things to criticise here but that one ain't itCan we stop this 'SA played a spinner, they're smarter therefore won' BS please?
Ajaz was injured. Ravindra was next cab off the rank and he is a part-timer, and it's very likely he would have played ahead of CdG if he had played. Somerville wouldn't have made a lick of difference and your other option is Santner. Maharaj is a great bowler and SA were right to pick him, but we picked the best XI to win that game. And we performed badly, and lost. All this revisionist BS about a same-same attack, when we had a left armer, a 6 foot 10 bounce bowler and two swing bowlers.
I enjoy literary licence as much as anyone, but this is quite an example.Maharaj is a great bowler
Hmm, I was going to say he averages less than the 'GOAT' but he doesn't. ****.I enjoy literary licence as much as anyone, but this is quite an example.