He chucks so noGarbage captaincy, surely if you want to bowl a part timer you bowl SKY.
You mean the womens Proteas skipper Dane van Niekerk.... I certainly hope so.Lady Commie talked far more sense than Haysman & Nicholas.. For once I heard someone talking about strategy & field placings
Dane is the only reason I haven't turned the coms off as I did during the test series.Lady Commie talked far more sense than Haysman & Nicholas.. For once I heard someone talking about strategy & field placings
Hmm.. That's good to hear. She sounds greatYou mean the womens Proteas skipper Dane van Niekerk.... I certainly hope so.
Nattu was injured, he'll surely be back in the mix. Nattu, Bumrah and Chahar seems like a good pace bowling trio for T20s. Plus we'll have Jaddu/Axar and Washi back, so not too worried about how we'll do in T20s.better off taking risks and picking natrajan and Tyagi than this garbage
I don't have a problem with Ash, he bowled well in the T20 WC and he only failed in the last game since his return to white ball cricket. Also, he did create a chance in the last game when de Kock was attacking early on and Pant messed it up, that could have changed the game. Same thing happened in the first game, he bowled tough overs on both occasions, won't really criticise him for one failure.If india pick ashwin, Bhuvi, Chahar, Thakur, next world cup i am not even bother going to watch seriously.
Even when Kuldeep bowled Chahal always got easier overs.Any reason why the collar chewer gets the easiest overs to bowl? Even in the first two games, Ash bowled difficult overs in the PP and created a chance against Peacock in both games but was let down by our fielders/keeper. Ash ended up looking worse than how he actually fared while the collar chewer bowled easy overs and came out looking economical.
Don't worry no one will watch that side.If india pick ashwin, Bhuvi, Chahar, Thakur, next world cup i am not even bother going to watch seriously.