Wasim was arguably more skillful at reverse but not as destructive as Imran. And then there's Waqar...If reverse swing is so great, surely left arm reverse swing is even greater?
True, but a cordon of Richards, Sobers and Warne is less than inspiring, especially Warne at 3rd.Fair point. I hate it when openers are picked as middle-order bats just to shoehorn them into the XI. But, for me, a middle order player should be able to bat anywhere from 3 to 6 in most cases.
Thus,
Viv Richards
Don Bradman
Lara and Smith were very close. But I don't think anyone bar Bradman dominated bowlers over a sustained period of time like Viv in his prime. And can you imagine a 5-7 of Viv, Sobers, and Gilchrist? ****ing hell.
It was fun to watch ?I don't like the way Hammond made all those Dinosaurs come back to life and they ate people, that was irresponsible. I didn't even know he played cricket
Fixed.Would be an insult if Gavaskar, the undisputed best bat of the 70s and 80s, cant make an ATG XI.
Just confirming that we are talking about the guy who averaged sub-40 away from home in the 80'sFixed.
Not nearly. But ok.Fixed.
Can be 5 or 6, Sobers can swap to accomodate.Hmm, Hammond or Lara - who is better suited to this lineup? Given we're selecting a #6, I'll take Lara for his credibility against spin and high SR. Smith needs a few more years and Viv just missed out imo.
Bradman to captain
Few stats really surprise me, but that one genuinely did.Just confirming that we are talking about the guy who averaged sub-40 away from home in the 80's
The King vs the Prince...Bradman running away with the captaincy vote.
Richards and Lara tied with 6 voted each.
Like Viv?A great team, as this one obviously is, should be well rounded and complete in every way. Along with having a strong batting order and bowling attack, it should have at the very least a decent or competent 5th bowler and some batting depth in the tail. But it also needs to have a good fielding team ,especially a great cordon to fully complement and take advantage of the assembled attack.
I know that apart from myself that only TJB and a few others really pushes the importance of having specialists catchers in these teams, but it really is as important as having a competent tail and or batsman who can turn their arms over for a few overs or break partnerships.
What's the point of Lara when you already have a flamboyant West Indian lefthander in Sobers who was arguably even better?Hmm, Hammond or Lara - who is better suited to this lineup? Given we're selecting a #6, I'll take Lara for his credibility against spin and high SR. Smith needs a few more years and Viv just missed out imo.
Bradman to captain
Haven't suggested players with different skill levels.Like Viv?
Specialist catchers seems a stretch honestly. Certainly not a big enough factor to decide over someone with greater skill in their core discipline.
Can't have too much of a good thing. Both #5 and #6 being left handed and quick scorers doesn't matter at all to me. I'd be happy to compromise on any of the alternatives obviously but my reasoning leads me to believe that Lara is the best fit for this particular side. His ability to destroy spinners and perform miracles makes Lara the best choice IMO. Hammond is more suited to #3/4 and I think Lara > Richards slightly. More relevantly, Lara came good against better quality spin.What's the point of Lara when you already have a flamboyant West Indian lefthander in Sobers who was arguably even better?