• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All time world test XI selection

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Also, as others have said, in a team like this, he may not even get a bowl (crazy to say for a bowler with 200+ wickets) - and he still easily makes this team. There's a strong argument for him to be the second best batsman of all time, and I don't think there is anyone who would seriously argue against him being in the top five batsmen of all time.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Sobers at 6
Imran at 8.

I figured Imran will be better coming on at first change instead of Hadlee, who is a new ball bowler. Imran will also get the ball reverse swinging so the team will have a weapon from overs 1 to 80.

See in my alltime side, I tend to think this way but then I also feel Wasim will add more at that slot to the side than Imran. Imran is definitely the better cricketer and perhaps even the better bowler but the uptick in quality is not that high that it will devolve the other advantages of having Wasim - left armer, left hand bat etc. And if you need big runs from your #8 you are ****ed anyways. For a typical #8 role, I feel Wasim would add more to the side than Imran.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Update.

Sobers - 12
Hammond - 3
Lara - 2
Richards - 1
Smith - 1
Miller - 1


Imran - 9
Hadlee - 6
Wasim - 2
Muralitharan - 1
Steyn - 1
Davidson - 1
 

Nikhil99.99

U19 Cricketer
And the most important part, he's a top 5 batsman on top of everything else, he can make the team as a batsman alone before we look at the bowling and fielding. He is a lock for this or any possible team.

I believe he's just being contrarian for the sake of it at this point.
Ya,Sobers makes the team in batting alone.No question on that at all.I would have Hammond at 5,sobers at 6 in my all time team
 
Last edited:

Days of Grace

International Captain
Interesting people are choosing Hammond. Great batsman but he made a great deal of runs against new nations in test cricket and also scored a bucketload in 1928/29 against a poor Australian attack in timeless matches. Not worthy of a place in the first XI, IMO.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Interesting people are choosing Hammond. Great batsman but he made a great deal of runs against new nations in test cricket and also scored a bucketload in 1928/29 against a poor Australian attack in timeless matches. Not worthy of a place in the first XI, IMO.
Averaged 70 in Australia.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
See in my alltime side, I tend to think this way but then I also feel Wasim will add more at that slot to the side than Imran. Imran is definitely the better cricketer and perhaps even the better bowler but the uptick in quality is not that high that it will devolve the other advantages of having Wasim - left armer, left hand bat etc. And if you need big runs from your #8 you are ****ed anyways. For a typical #8 role, I feel Wasim would add more to the side than Imran.
I think with the ATG exercise we are assuming they are competing against the strongest competition imaginable, meaning every run, including late order runs, count. Which is why I would have preferred Hadlee over McGrath too.

And I dont see Wasim being left-handed means much when you already have Sobers you can offer you variety in both pace and spin.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I think with the ATG exercise we are assuming they are competing against the strongest competition imaginable, meaning every run, including late order runs, count. Which is why I would have preferred Hadlee over McGrath too.

And I dont see Wasim being left-handed means much when you already have Sobers you can offer you variety in both pace and spin.
Are we saying all left armers are the same? So why do you need Imran when you have Marshall and Ambrose?
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Sobers at 6
Imran at 8.

I figured Imran will be better coming on at first change instead of Hadlee, who is a new ball bowler. Imran will also get the ball reverse swinging so the team will have a weapon from overs 1 to 80.
Completely agree with this. Think Viv belongs at 5.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Are we saying all left armers are the same? So why do you need Imran when you have Marshall and Ambrose?
No but the main justification for having Wasim in the attack (his left arm variety) isnt as compelling if Sobers is already likely to bowl. Though frankly I think the left-arm thing is overrated.

Imran gives you reverse plus is the best bowling all-rounder ever.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I saw Sobers bat.He was better batsman for sure.
But Kallis matched sobers as a bowler,almost as a batsman and as a fielder.Cant be in different level if you don’t have much better stats in any of 3 departments.The stats don’t show sobers was in different level.
Kallis
13000+ runs at 55
292 wkts at 32
200 catches
Sobers
8000+ runs at 57
235 wkts at 34
109 catches
Doesnt look in different level.Sobers>=kallis.But not in different level or anything close to different level.
I think its important for an ATG team for all-rounders to be at elite level in their primary skill, and I think Kallis the batsman falls short of that.
 

Top