I'm just going to say something to defend CricSim, or at least try and rationalise my own participation there.
Firstly, the Cribbtopia of CricSim was that you could say what you liked and you could get called out for it. Yep, there was overt, disgraceful racism on there, but firstly, that meant you knew the sort of people you were dealing with and secondly, you could call them out for it. I think this thread, and some of the comments from people like Teja and Shri have shown me that being able to respond isn't good enough - and the harm that can still be done by that - but personally I would rather know of an interlocutor's bigotry than set up an environment where people don't say what they really feel and they're just as racist, but you just don't know it.
Then let's just put that in the perspective of CricketWeb. There's much less overt racism, but let's not pretend that hasn't been present on here in the past. And on CricketWeb, if you respond in too bolshy a way then you [were] likely to be the person to get warned or infracted. It's a much more subtle form of racism we've seen on here because the overt stuff gets dealt with immediately. But that insidious, subtle stuff has been allowed to fester and, I suspect, caused as much harm as the bull**** on CricSim. I mean, I've basically been told not to worry my pretty little head about it when I've raised these issues in the past.
But I will apologise for my part in enabling an unsafe environment for people on CricSim - I can't pretend that I wasn't a significant part of the environment there. I honestly thought openness and the opportunity to openly debate with these bigots without prejudice was better, but the intervening years and some of the posting here tells me that wasn't the case.