There was a lot of wishful thinking from the selectors in Wright, L's career. He was probably as close as we had to an allrounder in the post-Flintoff, pre-Stokes interregnum.looked up luke wright and he has 50 odis and 50 t20s despite really struggling. how tf did that happen. i know england had a lean era, but surely you get the idea after 20-30 matches?
Nah come on, Dravid was one of the GOAT Indian batsmen against swing.Australia was 6 months ago though, not 6 years.
This reminds me of people writing off Dravid 10 years ago.
bet dravid wished he had the current attack
Can we stop the comparisons please. A few months ago someone said they would take Pujara over Dravid in an all-time side and I was flabbergasted.
it’s not writing off his previous contributions - even recent ones like in Australia. But you gotta keep scoring or make way for someone who can. Go back to FC cricket, score runs and earn the spot again.I don’t really mean to compare him to Dravid tbh. I just think he’s class and writing him off is silly.
There's only one winner in this Test from here. Hopefully these two can bat the rest of the day and gain some confidence.Have the Indian batsmen forgotten it is necessary to score runs to win a cricket match?
who bats #3 then?it’s not writing off his previous contributions - even recent ones like in Australia. But you gotta keep scoring or make way for someone who can. Go back to FC cricket, score runs and earn the spot again.
Sorry if I’m coming off as unnecessarily aggressive btw. I was just aghast that someone who hasn’t lived our painful experience wrt playing in England had the audacity to comment on it.I don’t really mean to compare him to Dravid tbh. I just think he’s class and writing him off is silly.
Give Agarwal a shot I reckon. He's already got a couple of double centuries to his name (albeit one was against Bangladesh)who bats #3 then?