• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Top 30 batsmen of the modern era (1990s -Current)

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hope Kane smashes all comers in the next 3 years tbh. It's his best shot. Underachieved till now.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Carrying his bat in England and then immediately going back to open after India followed on is some premium ****.
The famous series where tendulkar (deliberately left in lower case btw, like his character) wouldn't move from number four despite all the injuries and unavailability India had. Dravid though - yep, straight up to open because he thought of the team instead of just himself. WAFG he was.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Kane's 2 lowest averages in a country are 21 in SA and 26 in SL; Mahela's are 27 in NZ and 27 in SA. Is there really that much between them? Mahela has had a complete career to so that goes in his favour. By end of his career, Kane can certainly inch ahead. At this point it's hardly shocking that he is just below.
 

Gob

International Coach
Also is it me or was Rahul Dravid insanely good looking?

Probably batting with a hobbit for most of his career made him look a lot taller than he actually was too
 

Flem274*

123/5
Kane's 2 lowest averages in a country are 21 in SA and 26 in SL; Mahela's are 27 in NZ and 27 in SA. Is there really that much between them? Mahela has had a complete career to so that goes in his favour. By end of his career, Kane can certainly inch ahead. At this point it's hardly shocking that he is just below.
the difference is samplesizelol. Kanes got about 30-40 away tests, but per country its miniscule.

kohli, smith and root fit roughly 8 years of williamsons english sample size into just one series.

the disparity in opportunity is a bit of a joke. india and australia should beat nz handily outside nz, but no one else has that excuse to avoid hosting nz.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
the difference is samplesizelol. Kanes got about 30-40 away tests, but per country its miniscule.

kohli, smith and root fit roughly 8 years of williamsons english sample size into just one series.

the disparity in opportunity is a bit of a joke. india and australia should beat nz handily outside nz, but no one else has that excuse to avoid hosting nz.
Well yeah it's unfair and all, but it is what it is and we can't assume that if he was given more tests he'd have a better record and therefore is better than Dravid.

You have to wait for it to actually happen.
 

srbhkshk

International Captain
He has had 12 innings in England, 13 in India and 7 each in SA & SL. #samplesizelol doesn't work just one way - it's as likely to give you an absurdly high average as it is for an absurdly low one. There's a very clear separation in Kane's numbers in places that are typically harder to bat versus those which are typically easier to bat.

And as others have mentioned - even if it indeed is #samplesizelol - how does that make him better than Dravid?
 

Top