• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* 2nd Test at the MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chennai, 13 - 17 Feb 2021

D

Deleted member 38150

Guest
Very good 50 for Rahane! hope he coverts this to big one..
 

Flem274*

123/5
All modern day batsmen tend to play the swinging ball away from their body, and Rohit is usually more willing to leave the ball than most (see: Kohli). If that's the worst of his technical sins then he's pretty sound relatively speaking.
i actually thought about raising kohli as an example of someone who can succeed despite following the ball (he's a serial offender) but i've already got the english chasing ghosts i cbf potentially dealing with the indian posters.

the big difference is kohli reads length so much better than rohit does and he plays straighter.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
All modern day batsmen tend to play the swinging ball away from their body, and Rohit is usually more willing to leave the ball than most (see: Kohli). If that's the worst of his technical sins then he's pretty sound relatively speaking.
No they don’t. And when they do they don’t all try to play it square through cover point with an angled bat as he does. It’s absolutely a significant technical flaw in his game.
 

cnerd123

likes this
i actually thought about raising kohli as an example of someone who can succeed despite following the ball (he's a serial offender) but i've already got the english chasing ghosts i cbf potentially dealing with the indian posters.

the big difference is kohli reads length so much better than rohit does and he plays straighter.
I don't think Rohit actually reads length badly, he's just plays bad shots sometimes. He plays some ridiculously great shots that suggest it's not that hard for him to pick length. He just doesn't have Kohli's shot selection.

Kohli is far more likely to nick off to swinging balls outside his off stump than Rohit IMO. Can't seem to avoid temptation.

No they don’t. And when they do they don’t all try to play it square through cover point with an angled bat as he does. It’s absolutely a significant technical flaw in his game.
Eh I think what you're describing is a very common phenomenon in modern day cricket, especially with batters who are proficient in white ball stuff.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's weird that despite rahane's dry spell over the last few years, he's steadily improved against spin. Played Lyon way better than before too.
 
D

Deleted member 38150

Guest
I don't think Rohit actually reads length badly, he's just plays bad shots sometimes. He plays some ridiculously great shots that suggest it's not that hard for him to pick length. He just doesn't have Kohli's shot selection.

Kohli is far more likely to nick off to swinging balls outside his off stump than Rohit IMO. Can't seem to avoid temptation..
What is baffling to me is, Rohit has the ideal game for long innings. he has much more variety of shots than kohli IMO. can play the short ball a lot more comfortable and unlike kohli doesnt need to run singles frantically to score big 100s. But still, he chooses to play a rash shot and give it all away..
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why did they choose that particular forward defence from rahane as an example. Wasn't a good one because he could well have left it.
 

Top