Arachnodouche
International Captain
Is Pant not considered for shorter formats? Sounds laughable if true.
Been given opportunities but never really took them.Is Pant not considered for shorter formats? Sounds laughable if true.
He suffers from Sehwag-Slater-itis... An aggressive long form batsman who cannot quite crack LO cricket's pace for whatever reason.Is Pant not considered for shorter formats? Sounds laughable if true.
Is Rahul that much of an improvement though? If anything seems as or more suspect mentally.
He suffers from Sehwag-Slater-itis... An aggressive long form batsman who cannot quite crack LO cricket's pace for whatever reason.
"TN sometimes don't just pick him when Ashwin is available" is looking more and more like the horribly stupid selection policy it seemed to me when @honestbharani explained it to me a few months back.Good on Sundar making it difficult to drop him, his batting looks great.
He was also very young tbf. Sometimes long form cricket can be hard on a teenage bowler's body. So that may have played a part too. And honestly, it is not just Ash. We have a factory line of spinners, and esp. finger spinners for whatever reason."TN sometimes don't just pick him when Ashwin is available" is looking more and more like the horribly stupid selection policy it seemed to me when @honestbharani explained it to me a few months back.
Idk, isn't that pretty common? The lesser batsmen are more prone to giving it away, it's the really experienced guys who often need good balls to prise them out. Obviously Pujara's dismissal is more in the "freak accident" category than either of those.Lol.. the only 3 batsmen who were done in by good balls have been Rohit, Virat and Ash. Won't have believed it if you said that at the start of the game. 3 of our most experienced batsmen done in by good bowling.