I actually don't think there's a regulatory limit. In theory a team could have 50,000 concussion subs if players were just repeatedly concussed and replaced.Anyone know the maximum number of concussion subs a team can have in a match.
In July 2019, the International Cricket Council (ICC) agreed to allow the use of concussion replacements in all international cricket matches from 1 August 2019, with substitute having to be a "like-for-like replacement" and approved by the Match Referee.[20]
1.2.8.1 In assessing whether the nominated Concussion Replacement should be considered a like-for-like player, the ICC Match Referee should consider the likely role the concussed player would have played during the remainder of the match, and the normal role that would be performed by the nominated Concussion Replacement.
1.2.8.2 If the ICC Match Referee believes that the inclusion of the nominated Concussion Replacement, when performing their normal role, would excessively advantage their team, the Match Referee may impose such conditions upon the identity and involvement of the Concussion Replacement as he/she sees fit, in line with the overriding objective of facilitating a like-for-like replacement for the concussed player.
For example: If David Warner, a pure batsman, is injured in a Test match and Australia name Mitchell Marsh, an all-rounder, as his replacement, then the match-referee has the power to restrict Marsh from bowling in the match.
This attack is mostly made up of all rounders and concussion subs though. It's not as good as some shield attacks.Pant keeps scoring those hundreds in Australia. Should be in the AT Border Gavaskar XI of more people by end of this tour.
Nah, Abbott and Steketee are genuine #6 and #7 ranked pace bowlers in Australia while Swepson clearly #2 spinner.This attack is mostly made up of all rounders and concussion subs though. It's not as good as some shield attacks.
And in the indian second innings Abbott was injured, stekekee had an injury scare and Swepson struggled to land the ball on the pitchNah, Abbott and Steketee are genuine #6 and #7 ranked pace bowlers in Australia while Swepson clearly #2 spinner.
Which would be the case regardless of who we pick, alas.Looks like we're gonna be constantly 2/20
tbf he was the best batsman in the previous BG series on debut. He got starts each time at least. Has he become worse?Looks like we're gonna be constantly 2/20
Last series he played against England he wasn't even doing that. And failed against Sri Lanka when everyone else cashed in. So.....arguably.tbf he was the best batsman in the previous BG series on debut. He got starts each time at least. Has he become worse?
well he's played on pitches that have been helpful to spin, compared to this rubbish at the SCGGenuinely unimpressed with Swepson. Dude looks like a Club bowler , but seemingly has taken quite a lot of wickets in domestic. Is it symptomatic of domestic batsmen just not good at all against leg spin ? Or is he a Graeme Hick type person who can't do it against top level opposition ?
what injury did Sabba pick up?And in the indian second innings Abbott was injured, stekekee had an injury scare and Swepson struggled to land the ball on the pitch
Now you understand how I’ve felt about ashwin on every Indian tour since 2011.Genuinely unimpressed with Swepson. Dude looks like a Club bowler
Yes to the first to a degree. But he's extraordinarily prone to completely losing his length and just bowling full toss trash for an entire innings if the chakras are not steady.Genuinely unimpressed with Swepson. Dude looks like a Club bowler , but seemingly has taken quite a lot of wickets in domestic. Is it symptomatic of domestic batsmen just not good at all against leg spin ? Or is he a Graeme Hick type person who can't do it against top level opposition ?