Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
CorrectAnd then Symonds will make it 11 as a make shift opener and 5th bowler.
CorrectAnd then Symonds will make it 11 as a make shift opener and 5th bowler.
Well, Kapil did what Pollock did but was significantly betterDhoni (along with Pollock) has a real case for being the best. For every other player there is someone who played a similar role, but arguably did it better.
When did PFK learn to hack accounts?Well, Kapil did what Pollock did but was significantly better
Are there bowlers like him and McGrath anymore? Maybe a few with similar styles but nowhere near as goodPollock played until 2008 and finished with a better economy rate than McGrath and Akram. Spent almost his entire career at the top of the rankings as Bolo said. Basically S tier as a bowler alone and when you add the runs he's any captain's dream.
Weird how you don't see bowlers like him and McGrath in ODIs anymore though.
Too short.Are there bowlers like him and McGrath anymore? Maybe a few with similar styles but nowhere near as good
Mohammad Abbas I guess
Cummins is closer but I kind of think Cummins is more of a Ryan Harris with a bit more bounce.Too short.
Cummins and Haze to an extent maybe.
Haze would definitely be in Aus' best team but you're right that he never seems to play unless it's a World Cup. Permanently rested.Too short.
Cummins and Haze to an extent maybe.
Pollock lacked pace only for ha;f a decade. Before that he was damn quick.(lack of) pace, corridor bowler and height you mean? jason holder fits surely
Those are ODI figures?Fun comparison between Pollock and McGrath:
pre-2000 Pollock averaged 20, post-2000 averaged >25
pre-2000 McGrath averaged 22, post-2000 averaged 20
Working on a few assumptions that could indicate that Pollock relied slightly more on pace than McGrath did. McGrath actually got more effective as he slowed down and Pollock got less.
No Test sorry. Just defaulted to that lolThose are ODI figures?
They dont at all. 118 wickets @ 23.4 in the 90s vs 275 wickets @24.5 in the 2000s. If anything he was statistically better in the 2000s. Economy was better too.No Test sorry. Just defaulted to that lol
edit: The ODI figures show a similar story though
When I say a "similar story" I'm talking about the comparison between the 2. McGrath's figures post-2000 improve more than Pollock's do.They dont at all. 118 wickets @ 23.4 in the 90s vs 275 wickets @24.5 in the 2000s. If anything he was statistically better in the 2000s. Economy was better too.