• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* West Indies Tour of England 2020

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Philander was not exactly terrible the last tour of Aus. You can do well in Aus without pace as a bowler. It is just that from an overall attack point of view you need at least one excellent fast bowler as well in Aus for when it does goes flat. Wood and Archer seem a bit redundant in the Eng attack when you have a player of Broads ability and Stokes around.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bit of a myth that you need express pace to succeed in Australia. Most of the bowlers who've been successful there aren't bowling 140+ every ball.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'd wager that bouncy and accurate ones do best though of course if you're Dale Steyn levels of skilled at swinging the Kookaburra you can just do that instead
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bit of a myth that you need express pace to succeed in Australia. Most of the bowlers who've been successful there aren't bowling 140+ every ball.
It’s really not a myth at all tbh. Bounce helps a lot too tbf
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Broad seems pretty pissed off with the decision to drop him and fair enough too. You'd hope that having almost 500 Test wickets and being the standout bowler in your team over the last year would protect you from horses-for-courses style selection.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bit of a myth that you need express pace to succeed in Australia. Most of the bowlers who've been successful there aren't bowling 140+ every ball.
Who said that?

It's not about "need". It just works a lot better in Australia than it does in England, from my time at least.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Broad seems pretty pissed off with the decision to drop him and fair enough too. You'd hope that having almost 500 Test wickets and being the standout bowler in your team over the last year would protect you from horses-for-courses style selection.
Yeah he’s well justified you’d think. Has to be a better bowler than Wood anywhere, let alone at home
 

Stapel

International Regular
Not one English fielder looked convinced Brathwaite had knicked that with his bat, yet Stokes went upstairs. Or do I read those faces differently?
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Broad seems pretty pissed off with the decision to drop him and fair enough too. You'd hope that having almost 500 Test wickets and being the standout bowler in your team over the last year would protect you from horses-for-courses style selection.
Given his home record over the last 5 years is 132 wickets with an average under 26 it is a very strange decision. Away I could understand it but not at home.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It’s really not a myth at all tbh. Bounce helps a lot too tbf
Really? There's diminishing returns imo. Once you're bowling at a reasonable fast-medium sort of pace, accuracy matters far more than adding a few clicks. If you don't have the consistency and just keep bowling faster then good luck.

Kabbott, Harris, Haze and even Cummins most days don't bowl proper heat yet have found so much success.
 

Stapel

International Regular
Broad seems pretty pissed off with the decision to drop him and fair enough too. You'd hope that having almost 500 Test wickets and being the standout bowler in your team over the last year would protect you from horses-for-courses style selection.
Considering Broad would be the right horse for this course, the whole decision seems odd, anyway.

Same with batting first. Is that Stokes' decison? It formally is, but you'ld expect team management to have a better plan.

Ergo: English team management is quite silly.
 

Top