OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think a high 20s averaging opener can be a positive addition to a weak lineup if he regularly sees off the new ball atleast. Kind of like a better version of Akash Chopra.
This is where I think Denly's thing of constantly getting starts may not be totally useless opening the way it is at #4, especially since he's, you know, an opener.I think a high 20s averaging opener can be a positive addition to a weak lineup if he regularly sees off the new ball atleast. Kind of like a better version of Akash Chopra.
Yeah I thought it was a **** pick at the time too tbf. If he was dropped I wouldn't complain at all. It did seem like a good opportunity for me to pedal my general theory of not over-rating your stocks though.Agree with that in general but the thing is that Denly was a weird pick in the first place. He was at least in part picked because they thought he might be able to bowl some spin in Sri Lanka.
I think Ballance realistically needs a few Tests at 4/5. OK he's very flawed technically, but he still at least can score runs from time to time. Feel like England have picked him at **** times and have been too keen to dump him when the side loses. I don't see him succeeding, but he might at least have the chance.England obviously did that early on with the openers, Carberry and Compton for sure. Maybe with Malan last summer as well. Ballance as well I suppose although you had the obvious technical problems there, I was always reluctant for England to discard him though as he was one of the very few who had actually scored runs. Would not even hate it if he came back now.
Yes exactly. It's about picking someone who could occasionally make it 100/3, or avoiding the slightly more dreaded 18/3. All options lead to this more often than not.I haven’t seen one suggestion yet that doesn’t still look like 30/3 more often than not.
Denly is now essentially playing instead of Malan so they have not really improved the situation. I think he was originally dropped for Pope though so that was fair enough. So weird that he has been the only player the dropped after two Tests. He will obviously be back soon though.I think Ballance realistically needs a few Tests at 4/5. OK he's very flawed technically, but he still at least can score runs from time to time. Feel like England have picked him at **** times and have been too keen to dump him when the side loses. I don't see him succeeding, but he might at least have the chance.
Malan's form outside of Australia had been largely terrible though, and he never should've been picked in the first place. Maybe he's an Antipode (where the conditions are bouncier) specialist in a similar way that Jennings seems to do the best in Asia?
Next test presumably. Can't be an unchanged top 7.Denly is now essentially playing instead of Malan so they have not really improved the situation. I think he was originally dropped for Pope though so that was fair enough. So weird that he has been the only player the dropped after two Tests. He will obviously be back soon though.
I think the word “tit” crossed the mind of most people when they first read it.The OP looks genuinely quite foolish now tbh.