• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Roy’s spot at the top should not be in doubt

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think a high 20s averaging opener can be a positive addition to a weak lineup if he regularly sees off the new ball atleast. Kind of like a better version of Akash Chopra.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The only thing making Burns a high-20s averaging opener rather than high-teens is luck at this stage. Can't see him maintaining that against the better bowling attacks.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I think a high 20s averaging opener can be a positive addition to a weak lineup if he regularly sees off the new ball atleast. Kind of like a better version of Akash Chopra.
This is where I think Denly's thing of constantly getting starts may not be totally useless opening the way it is at #4, especially since he's, you know, an opener.

He's not a Test standard batsman but if you've only got two of those you don't just go in with eight bowlers or seven players. They've gotta pick someone. Eventually you get to the point where "no I know we've got good players, we've just gotta try the batch of players we initially thought were 45th-50th best" is kidding yourself and you're just weakening the team.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Agree with that in general but the thing is that Denly was a weird pick in the first place. He was at least in part picked because they thought he might be able to bowl some spin in Sri Lanka.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Agree with that in general but the thing is that Denly was a weird pick in the first place. He was at least in part picked because they thought he might be able to bowl some spin in Sri Lanka.
Yeah I thought it was a **** pick at the time too tbf. If he was dropped I wouldn't complain at all. It did seem like a good opportunity for me to pedal my general theory of not over-rating your stocks though.

I think quasi-following Zimbabwe for years gave me some perspective on it too. If Zimbabwe dropped batsmen every time they decided they "weren't Test standard" then they'd quickly end up massively weakening the team as they only produce a few players per generation that England for example would consider Test standard, and some of those end up overseas too. Part of selection is getting a gauge on just how good your stocks are and I guess in a way settling for performance that matches that. Even the good teams "settle" for batsmen averaging mid 40s when in theory replacements could be averaging mid 50s instead. There's always a bit of an implicit element of this in every dropping.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
England obviously did that early on with the openers, Carberry and Compton for sure. Maybe with Malan last summer as well. Ballance as well I suppose although you had the obvious technical problems there, I was always reluctant for England to discard him though as he was one of the very few who had actually scored runs. Would not even hate it if he came back now.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England obviously did that early on with the openers, Carberry and Compton for sure. Maybe with Malan last summer as well. Ballance as well I suppose although you had the obvious technical problems there, I was always reluctant for England to discard him though as he was one of the very few who had actually scored runs. Would not even hate it if he came back now.
I think Ballance realistically needs a few Tests at 4/5. OK he's very flawed technically, but he still at least can score runs from time to time. Feel like England have picked him at **** times and have been too keen to dump him when the side loses. I don't see him succeeding, but he might at least have the chance.

Malan's form outside of Australia had been largely terrible though, and he never should've been picked in the first place. Maybe he's an Antipode (where the conditions are bouncier) specialist in a similar way that Jennings seems to do the best in Asia?
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think Ballance realistically needs a few Tests at 4/5. OK he's very flawed technically, but he still at least can score runs from time to time. Feel like England have picked him at **** times and have been too keen to dump him when the side loses. I don't see him succeeding, but he might at least have the chance.

Malan's form outside of Australia had been largely terrible though, and he never should've been picked in the first place. Maybe he's an Antipode (where the conditions are bouncier) specialist in a similar way that Jennings seems to do the best in Asia?
Denly is now essentially playing instead of Malan so they have not really improved the situation. I think he was originally dropped for Pope though so that was fair enough. So weird that he has been the only player the dropped after two Tests. He will obviously be back soon though.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Denly is now essentially playing instead of Malan so they have not really improved the situation. I think he was originally dropped for Pope though so that was fair enough. So weird that he has been the only player the dropped after two Tests. He will obviously be back soon though.
Next test presumably. Can't be an unchanged top 7.
 

Bijed

International Regular
I'm glad that for once CW has reached a consensus - Roy's spot at the top is not in doubt becuase everyone agrees he should'nt be there
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Probably worth noting the only score Roy has made has been from #3...:ph34r:

Denly to open and Pope in at four for the next test?
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
I agree with that. In some ways it almost feels like he’s owed a couple of Tests in his preferred position in first class cricket.
 

Top