Ftfy.plunked ett for six
This kind of thing will only happen with people who are ignorant of the history of the game and don't need to be taken seriously.Yeah and that's all fair. My point was that in ten years time we'll get people who simply compare numbers and think one player is way better than another based on their playing in an easier era for batting.
Like, I would say that Greenidge was a better batsman than Hayden in ODIs, despite Hayden having a better strike rate. Borges argument is that we'll start to consider Roy to be better than players like Hayden/Greenidge based purely on his numbers, despite them not being comparable due to playing conditions.
By about 50 runs.Thought 400 was on for much of the innings, but 386 is obviously a massive total. England's highest at WC level?
Yeah, by some distance.Thought 400 was on for much of the innings, but 386 is obviously a massive total. England's highest at WC level?
Yeah I agree that is idiotic thing to do. Comparing them to their peers is best bet as I believe a great player would be great in any era although that still doesn't give you full picture it is safest.Yeah and that's all fair. My point was that in ten years time we'll get people who simply compare numbers and think one player is way better than another based on their playing in an easier era for batting.
Like, I would say that Greenidge was a better batsman than Hayden in ODIs, despite Hayden having a better strike rate. Borges argument is that we'll start to consider Roy to be better than players like Hayden/Greenidge based purely on his numbers, despite them not being comparable due to playing conditions.
All I'm saying is Chris Woakes opens your bowlingSome great striking from Woakesy and Plunkers. Reckon the new ball will do a little bit more than the BD bowlers made it look like, it is still a belter though so i expect them to get north of 300.