• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia v Pakistan ODIs UAE 2019

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
**** Stoinis bats so damn slow. Hit some damn gaps
quick maths: prior to today's ODI 54% of Stoinis' runs in odi cricket have been 4 or 6's. the obvious comparison, maxwell, has 59% of his runs scored by boundaries. 10% of the balls Stoinis has faced have resulted in a boundary, maxwell is 15%.

taking away the runs scored by boundaries and the balls faced that resulted in boundaries, Stoinis is 435 runs from 894 balls and maxwell is 1009 runs from 1721 balls

the point of this? dunno. i just didn't wanna waste the maths i did (which may contain mistakes anyway). i should probably do mmarsh numbers

edit mmarsh is 49% of runs through boundaries, 10% of the balls he's faced have resulted in a boundary and taking away the boundary stuff, he's 726 runs from 1377 balls, so a bit quicker than Stoinis but not by much. again, probably no real point to this
 
Last edited:

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
quick maths: prior to today's ODI 54% of Stoinis' runs in odi cricket have been 4 or 6's. the obvious comparison, maxwell, has 59% of his runs scored by boundaries. 10% of the balls Stoinis has faced have resulted in a boundary, maxwell is 15%.

taking away the runs scored by boundaries and the balls faced that resulted in boundaries, Stoinis is 435 runs from 894 balls and maxwell is 1009 runs from 1721 balls

the point of this? dunno. i just didn't wanna waste the maths i did (which may contain mistakes anyway). i should probably do mmarsh numbers

edit mmarsh is 49% of runs through boundaries, 10% of the balls he's faced have resulted in a boundary and taking away the boundary stuff, he's 726 runs from 1377 balls, so a bit quicker than Stoinis but not by much. again, probably no real point to this

Well yeah it proves Maxwell is considerably better at rotating strike.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I know you can't get too mad when no one else has got fifty but 135 balls is a lot to face to not even get 100

Hopefully this pitch is just really hard to bat on.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Terrible cricket all around. Horrible ball. Worse shot. Criminal fielding. ****ing infuriating.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well that was fun. He was due a bit of luck too re the dropped catch. Some awesome shots and he's booked his flight to England. 3rd run out in like 6 innings for him though lol, annoying
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pakistan played a second string attack in this series but none of their backup bowlers have put their hands up. Australia are coming along nicely.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That kid who opened the bowling for Pakistan is a potential gun

Amazing production line
 

Top