jimmy101
Cricketer Of The Year
We'll see about that in roughly three months time.Yes. It is the greatest ODI team in the history of the ODI game.
We'll see about that in roughly three months time.Yes. It is the greatest ODI team in the history of the ODI game.
The current England ODI team would be lucky to make more than 150 back in the 80s and 90s against the better teams of the eraThe current England ODI team beats any team from previous eras. Different game now.
Could end up being a situation similar to the 2002 Champions Trophy final.How I'd dearly like England and South Africa to remain winless in world cups.
Though I'd probably prefer New Zealand or South Africa to win over India.
Imagine how hilarious a New Zealand/South Africa final would be. I'm sure it'd end up being a tie, which by some obscure by- law would mean that Australia would retain the trophy.
Except both sides would drop the trophy trying to pick it up.Could end up being a situation similar to the 2002 Champions Trophy final.
Also, would be a perfect England in June memefestCould end up being a situation similar to the 2002 Champions Trophy final.
1. There is considerable difference in AVG and SR of specialist batsman in early 90s and late 90s.Love the stats inflation between two five year periods for no reason whatsoever. Really helps prove your point.
The beautiful thing is that Lara and Waugh both had very long careers and over the course of those careers were very similar statistically.
Why you would isolate a 46 match purple patch in a career of nearly 300 matches and cite it as a reason why player A was greater than player B is beyond me.
It's not like there was some event in 1995 that made Lara significantly worse. And if you're looking at his record as opener I'm not sure why you wouldn't include all his opening innings.
Face it, as an ODI player, Lara was of very similar calibre to Mark Waugh. That is, both players were exceptionally good and played in the best era of ODI cricket and faced many off the best ODI bowlers of all time.
Don't forget the two new balls, ensuring bowlers get Jack **** to work with in the death overs.The current England ODI team would be lucky to make more than 150 back in the 80s and 90s against the better teams of the era
Playing on roads with tiny boundaries and huge bats making it a "Different game now" doesn't make a team better
Would be a moderate upgrade over the England in July memes of the past.Also, would be a perfect England in June memefest
Gave it up.Don't take the bait.
Also, 0/0 isn't infinity ffs
You need to check the functionality of your frontal lobe tbh.You need to change your doctor or check the functionality of BP machine.
This would have been so much better had you said “even at someone as old and frail as Burgey”.Age/health jokes are not cool. Even when directed at Burgey.
sunilz has the mental age of a healthy 8 year old, so he's got you beat.sunilz bringing his sidesplitting sense of humour to the forum once again.
Fortunately for me but sadly for sunilz, I have the blood pressure of a healthy 18 year old, according to my doctor. Which means I will likely be around here for a long time to continue calling him out on his unadulterated bullshit.
My frontal lobe is working perfectly . I don't rate players on the basis of one tournament. Otherwise Sreesanth would be better than Dennis Lillee because he has won a WC. And Yuvraj better than Symonds because he won MOS in 2011 WC or Dravid a better ODI cricketer than Mark Waugh .You need to check the functionality of your frontal lobe tbh.
Also if you're picking Cairns as an ODI 7 finisher (rather than someone who can score 100s from 5/6), I'd pick Oram (much much better change bowler)Boult in for Mills now, surely?
The problem is who takes the new ball? Boult and Hadlee followed by Bond for me.