NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Bond ineligible for the 2000s ATG side? SR of 29, econ 4.something iirc. Average of 20. That's nuts.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
ODI ATG XIs
- Thread starter Red
- Start date
mr_mister
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That's basically Brett Lee but for half as long a career
h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
Imran was pretty poor with the ball in the final though. Will that be held against him ?
h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
While looking at the players records by runs scored in that decade, I saw Yuvraj somewhere in the top 10. Others around him were Dravid, Kallis, Jayawardene. Symonds did not cross my mind at that stage. Yes, he is better from all fronts.
Flintoff batted mostly at 5 and 6. Averaged 46 at a strike rate of 94 at #5 ! Was poor at # 6 though.
h_hurricane
International Vice-Captain
Bond has a better average and a much better economy rate though. Brett Lee by virtue of a long career is a better shout anyways.
_00_deathscar
International Regular
Think the idea of having an ATG XI is that we want the player to be fit to play against another hypothetical XI/aliens etc
_00_deathscar
International Regular
Feels like it's missing a Kohli/Ponting/Viv type player though.
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
NO, because he's there as an allrounder and he excelled in one discipline on the day. Got the job done. As Benny Elias would say, this isn't rocket surgery.
