They should have had more of a look at Maharaj. Everyone else has seemingly got a look in but they haven’t given him many opportunities in the past two years. Just the four games so far.I think there's an argument for a second spinner, but perhaps not him. I get the appeal of Shamsi, being a left-arm wrist spinner, but I'm yet to be convinced by him at international level.
I agree they should give Maharaj a go... but I do feel playing him is more about extending our batting than trying to find the best bowler for LO's.They should have had more of a look at Maharaj. Everyone else has seemingly got a look in but they haven’t given him many opportunities in the past two years. Just the four games so far.
And because for some ridiculous reason they scheduled a day-night match at Cape Town, the series could very well end up being decided by who wins the toss..This is not even a competitive 20/20 total on this ground. We go to Cape Town for the decider.
Both have been good.How did Rizwan keep? What of Malik's captaincy?
Lol, now that I think about it, this not a bad strategy for Hafeez. He's definitely retiring after the WC.Is there a chance Hafeez bowls very little before the World Cup and then chucks it left right and Centre at the tournament as there’s a good chance he’ll retire after?
He'd try to pull a Narine for sure, yeah.Is there a chance Hafeez bowls very little before the World Cup and then chucks it left right and Centre at the tournament as there’s a good chance he’ll retire after?
Four? That's is fine. A big issue with the current India batting is that unless one of our top 3 bats long, we have no ability to post a competitive score.A big issue with SA batting is that unless one of our top 4 bats through, we have almost no ability to recover.
Those top 3 are one of the best top 3 in history.Four? That's is fine. A big issue with the current India batting is that unless one of our top 3 bats long, we have no ability to post a competitive score.