Late 2007 was when he started to do it fairly regularly, but he only went full meme Baz in the last 2 years.Not sure why folks are only judging McCullum's record on his last 2 years either tbh. He opened in ODI from around 2008 didn't he?
Pretty much my view on it, although that rope is shortening.I'm prepared to give Munro more rope than most.
McCullum was basically in the team as a pure meme slogger in the latter part of his career and Munro clearly is the best equipped person we have to carry out that role. Has had tremendous success domestically in all formats and playing T20s both internationally and at franchise level, basically being a memey slogger. I'm not sure there is anything in particular about ODI cricket that is causing him to struggle, it still feels more like an outlier given the nature of his batting?
Haha, no.Why are people discounting McCullum vs. SL? SL were legit in those years. Same goes with Bangers and Munro.
Sure, but everyone seemed perfectly happy with him opening in the 2007-2014 period, when he record was only marginally better than Munro's, but anyway..Late 2007 was when he started to do it fairly regularly, but he only went full meme Baz in the last 2 years.
We weren't a world class team then.Sure, but everyone seemed perfectly happy with him opening in the 2007-2014 period, when he record was only marginally better than Munro's, but anyway..
It's only really post Ryder's axing that McCullum started treating ODI's like T20's though. His first turn as an opener was much more orthodox.Not sure why folks are only judging McCullum's record on his last 2 years either tbh. He opened in ODIs from around 2008 didn't he?
I'm just not sure there is any particular technical or mental reason why Munro would specifically struggle in ODIs? This is anathema to my usual mode of separating the formats, but this really feels like a case where given his overall body of work, the role we want him to do, the (still smallish) sample size of ODIs and how far short he is falling of requirements (25 average vs 32 average, maybe?): it just kinda feels like he is fully capable of doing what we want and it's pretty much just by chance that he has saved his failures up for one level of one format?Pretty much my view on it, although that rope is shortening.
Maybe he's just not good enough?There've been plenty of cricketers who've been beasts at domestics but have been unable to step up (Chris Lynn a reasonable example in Australia - though that's probably partially injury related). I also wouldn't call 47 ODI's a particularly small sample size, nor an average of 22 against the top sides to be at all close to the standard required (especially given that Munro's strike rate just isn't that flash to begin with). This all seems very charitable.I'm just not sure there is any particular technical or mental reason why Munro would specifically struggle in ODIs? This is anathema to my usual mode of separating the formats, but this really feels like a case where given his overall body of work, the role we want him to do, the (still smallish) sample size of ODIs and how far short he is falling of requirements (25 average vs 32 average, maybe?): it just kinda feels like he is fully capable of doing what we want and it's pretty much just by chance that he has saved his failures up for one level of one format?
Yeah would've loved Young to have had a proper go at some stage this, though it's probably getting too late in the piece now. Latham probably the best 11th hour switch option we have at this point.Will Young did brilliantly for NZ A in list a games in UAE and NZ, got picked in the test squad then forgotten for the ODIs.
His last 3 T20 games have been 43 off 28, 33 off 32 (only chasing 113), and 89 off 50
Not good enough at what?Maybe he's just not good enough?