quite possibly the ATG JAMODI series, that.Indeed. 2007 started with Aus losing badly to NZ.
quite possibly the ATG JAMODI series, that.Indeed. 2007 started with Aus losing badly to NZ.
Indeed.289 at the scg is plenty of runs, especially of the ball is not quite coming off the bat.
People have their ODI calibration set to Indian and English postage stamp grounds. Listening on the radio it definitely sounded like there was a bit in it for the bowlers.
If we can jag Rohit and Kohli early we become easy favourites.
I think Aus got a bit lucky. They shouldn't be happy with 290 on most Aus ODI wickets judging by the last few years.Indeed.
300 is usually above par in Australia.
Well played Australia. Nice to have another win.
I think they said it was a bit slower than recent years, hence they thought 280 was parI think Aus got a bit lucky. They shouldn't be happy with 290 on most Aus ODI wickets judging by the last few years.
This was acceptable in the first half of his innings. Didn't mind much with him scoring 10-12 runs in the first 40 balls. That was the right time for him to accelerate. Had he scored 70-80 by the time he got out, it would have been a good innings keeping the team in the chase. In the end, it turned out to be a pathetic innings without any clarity of vision.I'm usually the first guy to **** talk a slow Dhoni ODI innings, but I don't really mind this one tbh. When you come in 3 down in like 4 overs, with not the deepest of batting line ups you can't really be taking too many risks.
India did very well to get to where they were from 3 for nothing. Showing that they are easily the better team (of those selected) IMO, Aus got lucky with those 3 early ones
I am inclined to think opening him will be where he is least awful. He may not last long to impact team adversely there. But that is not going to happen. Also, moving Rohit or Dhawan out of their natural position may not be a good idea.Dhoni will play the world cup so I think 4 is the position he will be less awful in, ideally lower down the order you have some ballers to go hard.
I dunno..
Rohit-Dhawan-Kohli- Dhoni. Jadhav-Pant-Pandya...... Then 4 bowlers.
I see people online speculating about IPL players, that is pointless, India are conservative when it comes to ODI selection.
Yep. I am not advocating opening him. I wouldn't bat him at #4 either if the team is 200/2 after 35 overs on a really flat track. May have to float him around here and there based on match situation. How ironical that he would be the first man in every one's wish list 10 years back to capitalize on a solid start.Cant touch that top 3 whatsoever. Rohit is a beast in this format, while Dhawan has a great record in knock out ODI competitions. Its not ideal, but if Dhoni must play its 4. I loath the idea of him at the crease in the last 5-10 overs stinking it out.
If you want to shove all of Khawaja, Marsh, Handscomb, Stoinis and Maxwell in the team there isn't really any other choice.What's with Carey opening? Richardson is the only player to have a lower SR than him?
you just bat him at 7 and you open with Usman or Marsh or Maxwell or Handscomb or Stoinis...? Like, he only opens because he's a keeper and he's had the "keeper bats at 7 or opens" thing apply to him. He's not actually uniquely qualified for the job. anyone could do it.If you want to shove all of Khawaja, Marsh, Handscomb, Stoinis and Maxwell in the team there isn't really any other choice.
Is there any chance that if India field first, Pant takes the gloves instead of Dhoni?Dhoni will play the world cup so I think 4 is the position he will be less awful in, ideally lower down the order you have some ballers to go hard.
I dunno..
Rohit-Dhawan-Kohli- Dhoni. Jadhav-Pant-Pandya...... Then 4 bowlers.
I see people online speculating about IPL players, that is pointless, India are conservative when it comes to ODI selection.