Spark
Global Moderator
Yeah he's not brilliantI'm not a fan of Lane btw.
Yeah he's not brilliantI'm not a fan of Lane btw.
True. Rahane as a replacement for Laxman is a bigger disappointment than Pujara as Dravid's replacement. Rahane had a better start than VVS in test cricket, but it is all downhill since then.Not a big fan of Pujara the batsman, but **** if he doesn't have balls in surplus. As close to a replacement for Dravid as we could have hoped for in this day and age.
He has the most flawed technique of the lot for Australia's conditions but simply compensates through having balls of steel. A working man's hero.Not a big fan of Pujara the batsman, but **** if he doesn't have balls in surplus. As close to a replacement for Dravid as we could have hoped for in this day and age.
In any series, conditions notwithstanding, you're going to get one blinder and the remainder cringe from him. For a traditionally solid keeper, that would be a nice enough sweetener, but this guy can't keep for **** either.Just caught up with the Indian wickets. On a good deck after winning the toss they've thrown it all away. Reckless batting? Or good bowling? Have only watched the wickets, barring Pant wicket most are expansive shots leading to wickets. I saw Pant racing away early in the inning. Is he any good in Aussie?
Fully banking on Handscomb to make a name for himself this series.No need for pessimism. We'll help in making some of your guys legit superstars...for a summer at least.
Call me traditional and quite happy to get it wrong but I'm not convinced with either Shaw or Pant. Saw Shaw play at mount vs NZ A he wasn't all that good. Vihari looked in tremendous touch and likely will make a very good batsman. He needs to be given a go. Very organised batsman. What's this Indian team fetish work twenty 20 styled batting in test cricket?In any series, conditions notwithstanding, you're going to get one blinder and the remainder cringe from him. For a traditionally solid keeper, that would be a nice enough sweetener, but this guy can't keep for **** either.
May be building a case for himself as the consensus on intent from Ravi and Virat is around the corner.Seriously how long until Pujara learns his lesson. Don't try and run fast you can't do it, just stick to your strengths and take the easy ones where you only need a jog.
It's been relentlessly good bowling - bowling tight lines to good plans. Most of the batsmen who threw their wicket away (Rohit excluded) did so because they'd been set up for it. In, in, in, in, wide half volley that would be hittable but swings away type of stuff.Just caught up with the Indian wickets. On a good deck after winning the toss they've thrown it all away. Reckless batting? Or good bowling? Have only watched the wickets, barring Pant wicket most are expansive shots leading to wickets. I saw Pant racing away early in the inning. Is he any good in Aussie?
Protip: Don't listen to a single thing Matt Prior ever has to sayLyon might've turned into something of a dick over time but his offspin is so easy on the eye. Can't remember a non-chucking offie as good as him in a long long time.
Never have. What's the context?Protip: Don't listen to a single thing Matt Prior ever has to say
Swann was pretty good too. And lots of nice left-arm finger spinners come to mind, but aesthetically pleasing and effective right arm offies are so rare. Viru was very easy on the eye too, and occasionally very very good.Lyon might've turned into something of a dick over time but his offspin is so easy on the eye. Can't remember a non-chucking offie as good as him in a long long time.