Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
He won’t be come JanuaryJadeja's batting average is 33 and bowling average is 23 now.
Getting into proper allrounder territory.
He won’t be come JanuaryJadeja's batting average is 33 and bowling average is 23 now.
Getting into proper allrounder territory.
I think you can divide Jadeja's batting career into three distinct segments.Jadeja's batting average is 33 and bowling average is 23 now.
Getting into proper allrounder territory.
Yeah he'll probably still suck in Australia but so will half their specialist batsmen so meh.He won’t be come January
Interesting approach to analysing a bloke’s worth.Yeah he'll probably still suck in Australia but so will half their specialist batsmen so meh.
His fifty in the last test of the 2017 series vs Australia was immense too. High pressure situation, demanding conditions, quality attack and he came up trumps despite being jammy early on. If he'd gotten out early, Australia probably win that series. . The fact that now he's capable of both the counterattacking fifties, and the propah test knocks is very very encouraging.I think you can divide Jadeja's batting career into three distinct segments.
Phase 1:
Selected as an allrounder with a First Class average near 50 and a couple some triple hundreds under his belt, he was expected to contribute roughly evenly with bat and ball. As a result he took his batting very seriously and tried to b at 'properly' like a top order bat, and although he bowled even better than he was expected to and so kept himself in the frame, his batting was despicably bad. I remember making a post after he took a bag in South Africa early in his career that he could potentially challenge Ashwin's spot as overseas spinner if only his batting output could improve enough to bat #8 in Tests -- he was going that bad with the bat that #8 seemed too high.
Phase 2:
He gave up the pretence of being a batsman in order to provide useful engine room jam at the back end of innings. He slowly became a very good #8 with this counter-attacking style, but it all seemed to be tied together by the freedom playing as a bowler and having a care-free hit at the end of the innings gave him. You always got the sense that some real pressure would see him revert to a phase 1 cricketer, and as such he never batted above Ashwin even when he was outdoing him statistically.
Phase 3:
He's slowly but surely introduced elements of genuine batsmanship back into his game, essentially having another crack at what he was attempting in Phase #1, now with the security of his bowling record to ensure his selection and a lot more experience and confidence gained against Test bowlers. This has culminated in that awesome 90 in England and this ton here. The way he built the ton early on with singles here is something he wasn't capable of a couple of years ago -- a quick 60 sure, but previous attempts at this exact innings have tended to garner Phase #1 outputs from him.
He's (finally) a genuine #7 now IMO, and not just in India either. WAG.
India won't succeed overseas unless their openers can manage not to be walking wickets. Everything else is in place, pretty much.Interesting approach to analysing a bloke’s worth.
That was tragic watching. Good on him for cashing in - everyone should, but that was embarrassing
Double like. And yes, agree with the segregation. Also, Position be No 7 or 8, he should always be batting above Ashwin. Hopefully, he continually does now.I think you can divide Jadeja's batting career into three distinct segments.
Phase 1:
Selected as an allrounder with a First Class average near 50 and a couple some triple hundreds under his belt, he was expected to contribute roughly evenly with bat and ball. As a result he took his batting very seriously and tried to bat 'properly' like a top order bat, and although he bowled even better than he was expected to and so kept himself in the frame, his batting was despicably bad. I remember making a post after he took a bag in South Africa early in his career that he could potentially challenge Ashwin's spot as overseas spinner if only his batting output could improve enough to bat #8 in Tests -- he was going that bad with the bat that #8 seemed too high.
Phase 2:
He gave up the pretence of being a batsman in order to provide useful engine room jam at the back end of innings. He slowly became a very good #8 with this counter-attacking style, but it all seemed to be tied together by the freedom playing as a bowler and having a care-free hit at the end of the innings gave him. You always got the sense that some real pressure would see him revert to a phase 1 cricketer, and as such he never batted above Ashwin even when he was outdoing him statistically.
Phase 3:
He's slowly but surely introduced elements of genuine batsmanship back into his game, essentially having another crack at what he was attempting in Phase #1, now with the security of his bowling record to ensure his selection and a lot more experience and confidence gained against Test bowlers. This has culminated in that awesome 90 in England and this ton here. The way he built the ton early on with singles here is something he wasn't capable of a couple of years ago -- a quick 60 sure, but previous attempts at this exact innings have tended to garner Phase #1 outputs from him.
He's (finally) a genuine #7 now IMO, and not just in India either. WAG.
Rahane needs to get back into his old overseas form too.India won't succeed overseas unless their openers can manage not to be walking wickets. Everything else is in place, pretty much.
Yeah, Pujara could also do better.Rahane needs to get back into his old overseas form too.
Except their bowling.India won't succeed overseas unless their openers can manage not to be walking wickets. Everything else is in place, pretty much.
Looks really talented, scored runs in Under 19 cricket, and has also scored a a few tons in tour games (both in the West Indies against touring Test teams and for the West Indies in practice games) that haven't counted as FC.Why was there a hype on Hetmyer? He averages just 33 in first class cricket with just one century.
They were great in SA/England (apart from Ashwin messing up on a couple of friendly pitches)Except their bowling.
Been wondering the same. I won't believe until i start seeing results.Why was there a hype on Hetmyer? He averages just 33 in first class cricket with just one century.