• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Shakib Al Hasan vs Ian Botham / Burgey vs *****

Who the better all rounder

  • Shakib Al Hasan

    Votes: 21 42.9%
  • Ian Botham

    Votes: 28 57.1%

  • Total voters
    49

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
I hear what you're saying ***** but Shakib doesn't even have a nickname. Pretty hard to consider him an ATG when that isn't the case ;-)
 

cnerd123

likes this
Shakib doesn't need a nick name. He doesn't even need a last name. Utter the name Shakib and everyone knows who you're talking about. He's like Cher or Madonna or Prince. He's an icon. He's transcended the sport.

Meanwhile you talk about Ian and everyone goes "Ian Who?"
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
That's where "Beefy" comes into effect.

But in all seriousness I'd say Shakib will be an ATG by the time he retires. He's Bangladesh's first superstar. A little comparision between him & the first superstar produced by the other Test playing nations might be fun. Let me have a crack at this since I'm on lunch break.

AUS - Spofforth
BAN - Shakib
ENG - Grace
IND - Nayudu (or if he isn't good enough for you Merchant/Amarnath)
NZ - Cowie
PAK - Hanif/Fazal
RSA - Sinclair
SL - Somachandra de Silva (or Aravinda maybe)
WI - Headley
ZIM - Andy Flower

I'd rank them in this order in terms of skill & influence...

Grace
Headley
Spofforth
Shakib
Hanif (had to choose one of the above)
Cowie
Nayudu
Flower
Sinclair
S de Silva
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
True, if I was in the Caribbean I'd be trying to finish the game as quickly as possible too. Far too nice a place to be stuck in a cricket stadium.
 

Mr Miyagi

Banned
If it isn't Aravinda for Sri Lanka, then it has to be Dave Houghton for Zimbabwe and not A Flower. Even if Aravinda, I still think it is Dave Houghton for Zimbabwe.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ian Chappell says that the team had copped a bit of bad press in the lead up to the tournament, especially Thommo for his wanting to see blood on the wicket comment, so once Australia posted a big score they basically went on a PR exercise; bowling full, clapping good shots by the Little Lankans etc.

But then it started to get a bit out of hand because the LLs looked like they might chase it down, so he brought Thomson back at full tilt, and in two overs he undid any decent PR built up over the preceding couple of hours. There is some footage of him hitting Mendis in the Cricket in the 70s video iirc. It’s an awful incident.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
But then it started to get a bit out of hand because the LLs looked like they might chase it down, so he brought Thomson back at full tilt, and in two overs he undid any decent PR built up over the preceding couple of hours. There is some footage of him hitting Mendis in the Cricket in the 70s video iirc. It’s an awful incident.
Think I saw a clip of it in Fire in Babylon too. Straight on the forehead.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
If it isn't Aravinda for Sri Lanka, then it has to be Dave Houghton for Zimbabwe and not A Flower. Even if Aravinda, I still think it is Dave Houghton for Zimbabwe.
For sure. I only went with Flower cause I doubt all that many people outside of CW would have heard of Houghton, and was trying to go for players which were the first "superstar" produced by their respective country.

I rate Houghton really highly btw. Averaged 40+ at Test level when he was getting on a bit & was the backbone of the Zimbabwean batting lineup
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah my bad, I think you’re right. It was Fire in Babylon.

One of the few clips from almost side on which gives an idea of just how fast he was. For about two years he was maybe the the scariest and fastest bowler ever.

Also this article about him in a grade game is hilarious and scary all at once:

Wisden - Jeff Thomson is annoyed
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
Ian Chappell says that the team had copped a bit of bad press in the lead up to the tournament, especially Thommo for his wanting to see blood on the wicket comment, so once Australia posted a big score they basically went on a PR exercise; bowling full, clapping good shots by the Little Lankans etc.

But then it started to get a bit out of hand because the LLs looked like they might chase it down, so he brought Thomson back at full tilt, and in two overs he undid any decent PR built up over the preceding couple of hours. There is some footage of him hitting Mendis in the Cricket in the 70s video iirc. It’s an awful incident.
The press seemed to have it out for Chappelli's Australians. IMO they were doing nothing worse than John Snow or the Windies in the 80's. The only thing is Thommo was just too damn quick and the batsmen facing him, more often than not, had no way of protecting themselves.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think Chappell’s team was very brash, like him and was a bit of a shock to the establishment. I mean, Snow was a menace but he wrote poetry and was very urbane. Add to that Chappell’s role in starting WSC and you have a bloke the establishment was pretty keen to knock.

He also hated Bradman, so there was that.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
I think Chappell’s team was very brash, like him and was a bit of a shock to the establishment. I mean, Snow was a menace but he wrote poetry and was very urbane. Add to that Chappell’s role in starting WSC and you have a bloke the establishment was pretty keen to knock.

He also hated Bradman, so there was that.
Ture, true. Although the '75 CWC game against SL (and by extension the '75/'76 home series against WI) preceded WSC. The "dirty Australians" tag seemed to be already baked in by the time that happened. I guess when you've got blokes like Lillee, Thommo & Chappelli ruffling feathers like they did you're bound to get some blowback from the English media who were already biased against them to begin with.


And yeah, I guess opposing Bradman is always gonna inititate problems. Bill Lawry would know all about that.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That’s all true.

There was also the perception, albeit false, that before they came along fast bowlers didn’t bounce tail enders. It went on way before Lillee and Thomson (Lindwall bounced Tyson, Snow bounced Jenner etc) but they just made no secret of the fact they were just going to bounce the **** out of anyone and everyone.

FWIW if I could bowl quick I also wouldn’t pitch a ball in the batsman’s half. Ever.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
There was also the perception, albeit false, that before they came along fast bowlers didn’t bounce tail enders. It went on way before Lillee and Thomson (Lindwall bounced Tyson, Snow bounced Jenner etc) but they just made no secret of the fact they were just going to bounce the **** out of anyone and everyone.
Yeah, it was probably statements such as that coupled with Thommo's blood on the wicket comment that changed things. In a way Chappelli's side of the mid-70's revolutionised the sport. For better or for worse, broadly speaking, they turned it from a gentleman's pastime into a highly competitive professional sport.
 

Top