We should have known ending the Channel 9 tyranny would come at a heavy cost.List of what's being covered:
So yes. But no more ODI's/T20I's.
I'll bet $1000 you'll see Cowan on the ABC's team next summer.I'd love to hear Katich & Cowan commentating together. Would be so refreshing to hear after years of the same old, same old. Thankfully the days of viewers being reminded to watch "the Block" are over.
Are they AD free ?If the average Foxtel subscription is say around $90 per month, Fox would need an extra 656 250 subscriptions over the six-year period to cover the right's cost
Bearing in mind, in addition to the $630 million, they will have other expenses such as covering the matches, and also paying the commentators
********* is censored?What's exciting to me is the emergence of the Cricket Network online *********/highlights service. There is potential there if they can have the full footage of games available on their archives, along with curated highlight packages and live *********. And hopefully down the road it's more than just Australian cricket that gets this treatment
Well tbf it does have illegal connotations.********* is censored?
weird
Yeah, this is my theory. So that means that Warne, Clarke, Slater, KP and Nicholas may end up elsewhere but Healy, Taylor and Chappell probably don't (didn't count Lawry as the only reason he hasn't retired yet is because of how closely linked he was to 9).wrt the C9 comms, you'd probably guess that the ones more likely to cross over are the ones who do commentary gigs overseas (so that'll be Nicholas, Warne and Clarke) whilst the ones who only commentate on C9 games exclusively would probably hang up their boots
So does sodomy in some countries yet that's just fineWell tbf it does have illegal connotations.
IIRC it's one of a few words which causes problems with Google wrt what ads the site shows.********* is censored?
weird