Borges
International Regular
ICC was not a signatory of WADA in 2003.He would've been banned anyway if his sample were tested during the WC 2003
ICC was not a signatory of WADA in 2003.He would've been banned anyway if his sample were tested during the WC 2003
Wait are you saying that you think Symonds was lying about being called a monkey by Harbhajan? That's pretty paranoid if soHe would've been banned anyway if his samples were tested during the WC 2003, in fact with Warne testing positive during the WC it'd been a major scandal. So yes slap on the wrist considering what WADA recommends to other athletes. Can't agree with that, if he did call him then it'd be the second time he'd have uttered that word. Maybe not a problem for the rest of the team, but Harbhajan should've been sanctioned appropriately. A big if, of course but you can't justify someone going off the rails like that. As an aside I'd like to add that whatever Symonds said, to elicit such a response, should also have gone on record & he ought to have been given the just punishment for that as well.
There is another possibility which somehow Aussie supporters have not countenanced and which to us is very, very plausible. It is that Harby said a cuss word in Hindi language ("maa ki") which to Symonds et. al. who don't know Hindi sounded like "monkey". So neither was Harby racist nor Symonds a liar. Very plausible.Wait are you saying that you think Symonds was lying about being called a monkey by Harbhajan? That's pretty paranoid if so
Wouldn't surprise me. I just find it crazy that of all the issues from that series like ball tampering, delaying tactics etc., it's what is at best a stupid misunderstanding, and at worst a harmless little insult, that everyone remembers and goes on aboutThere is another possibility which somehow Aussie supporters have not countenanced and which to us is very, very plausible. It is that Harby said a slur word in Hindi language ("maa ki") which to Symonds et. al. who don't know Hindi sounded like "monkey". So neither was Harby racist nor Symonds a liar. Very plausible.
No I'm not saying he was lying but there's no solid evidence, like here, to back him up. So even if Harbhajan said maa ki, which is plausible, I'd still give him the equivalent of today's 1 match ban. If it was proven beyond reasonable doubt, then banning him for life wouldn't have been inappropriate IMO. This is why DRSgate is such a watershed moment as well, as it brings so many of their recent victories into question.Wait are you saying that you think Symonds was lying about being called a monkey by Harbhajan? That's pretty paranoid if so
That’s the difference between the greats and *****. He’s a posting sky rocket - you get a bit of a show at the start then a burnt out stick falls back to earth. Whereas we tend to keep the standard up the whole way through.Poor *****......from being on fire with his posting he's gone to barely lukewarm in a half a day
I wouldn't say calling a black person a "monkey" to be a harmless little insult.Wouldn't surprise me. I just find it crazy that of all the issues from that series like ball tampering, delaying tactics etc., it's what is at best a stupid misunderstanding, and at worst a harmless little insult, that everyone remembers and goes on about
I didn't say that, but I remember something about random dope testing during the WC, did that never happen? This is what I was talking about World anti-doping body condemns Warne ruling | Cricket | ESPNcricinfoICC was not a signatory of WADA in 2003.
I'd be very interested if the mods can access activity stats to hear how this week stacks up to a normal week and if it's close to any records. Ive tried hard but haven't been able to keep up with all the posts accross the various threads.Man, I've never seen CW this busy in a long time. We should have had a subforum for all this TBH. There are less people discussing actual cricket these days.
Only in series' featuring Australia and occasionally India. Check out the England v NZ one and it's 100% cricket. Wonder why.Man, I've never seen CW this busy in a long time. We should have had a subforum for all this TBH. There are less people discussing actual cricket these days.
That's because you win once in a blue moon, against the top 3Only in series' featuring Australia and occasionally India. Check out the England v NZ one and it's 100% cricket. Wonder why.
Tbf, most India series have been controversy free... Ind-NZ, Ind-Eng, Ind-SA recently were relatively mild mannered series. The only ill tempered one was... surprise surprise against Aus. Before that, the home SA series in 2015 was a bit feisty but it was because of the pitches, so atleast it was a cricketing issue and not rubbish like in this series... and even then, there wasn't much going on between the players, it was just fans on both sides going at it on social media.Only in series' featuring Australia and occasionally India. Check out the England v NZ one and it's 100% cricket. Wonder why.
From what I remember (correct me if I am wrong) there was a look of fear on Harby's face right after he uttered the word and Aussies took offence on the field. Wouldn't have happened if he intended to use racial slur.I for one am glad we're talkling about Sydney 08.
The "maa ki" thing sounds like a silly coverup. Unless you're Indian you won't really understand how plausible it actually is that Bhajji said that and not "monkey". It's a ridiculously common insult to throw around, particularly where harbhajan is from. There's a slight "n" sound in there too in the pronunciation which would make it sound a lot like "monkey" to a non-Indian. If someone actually came up with that as an excuse for harbhajan it's genius. More likely is that it's the truth.
There are more controversies in India Aus series these days than were in India-Pak series of last decade. That says somethingTbf, most India series have been controversy free... Ind-NZ, Ind-Eng, Ind-SA recently were relatively mild mannered series. The only ill tempered one was... surprise surprise against Aus. Before that, the home SA series in 2015 was a bit feisty but it was because of the pitches, so atleast it was a cricketing issue and not rubbish like in this series... and even then, there wasn't much going on between the players, it was just fans on both sides going at it on social media.
It was more one of confusion I think.From what I remember (correct me if I am wrong) there was a look of fear on Harby's face right after he uttered the word and Aussies took offence on the field. Wouldn't have happened if he intended to use racial slur.
India-England in 2012 was definitely not mild-mannered.Tbf, most India series have been controversy free... Ind-NZ, Ind-Eng, Ind-SA recently were relatively mild mannered series. The only ill tempered one was... surprise surprise against Aus. Before that, the home SA series in 2015 was a bit feisty but it was because of the pitches, so atleast it was a cricketing issue and not rubbish like in this series... and even then, there wasn't much going on between the players, it was just fans on both sides going at it on social media.
You'd have to go a while back is my point. The 2016 series was pretty tame.India-England in 2012 was definitely not mild-mannered.
Think he was referring to 2016 India v England.India-England in 2012 was definitely not mild-mannered.