Spark
Global Moderator
Or gotten out, and gotten India bowled out for 40. Which would have been hilarious, tbf.Could've actually stopped the collapse early and given us 50 extra runs.
Or gotten out, and gotten India bowled out for 40. Which would have been hilarious, tbf.Could've actually stopped the collapse early and given us 50 extra runs.
They were 7 for ****-all. Walk before you try to qualify for the 100m at the Olympics.Should have gone into power hitting zone to aim for 350. Anything below that is not defendable in ODIs.
Uh, of course that explains everything! My sarcasm alert has been quite off these days.ffs Spark he's being sarcastic
If there wasn't already a definition for doing a spark, not detecting sarcasm would be itThey were 7 for ****-all. Walk before you try to qualify for the 100m at the Olympics.
Rahane is better than Pujara for such situations.Seriously, Manish and Dinesh don't inspire any confidence. Just a School of thought. Why can't Pujara be played in ODI in seaming conditions. May be in S.A. He's not that bad player.
Yeah, absolutely. You would probably replace Dhawan with Rahane with that in mind. But even a country by country breakup shows Dhawan has raked up vastly better numbers than Rahane.This type of pitch is not the standard ODI pitch anywhere in the world, there's absolutely no reason to select the team with these in mind.
Good point - maybe only SAI don't know how many teams have better #4 candidates.
Rahul needs more time. I know he had a rough go at 4 but look at the dude. He can bat.This Indiabatting reminds me of SL 2011/12.
Top heavy not so much in the middle order..
How about Pujara at 4 in ODIs?
Pandey is a lost cause tbh
would have been ideal against this SL team then.Was a bit of a crap bowler bully iirc