TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
No one cares you clown, go awayThis is again very selective stats. There are also things like drawn series and drawn matches which are better than lost matches. England have also DRAWN home series against Pak/NZ. India haven't.
Also here is also the loss %:
Aus: 31%
India: 20%
New Zealand: 22%
South Africa: 29%
Pakistan: 45%
Sri Lanka: 44%
England: 45%
Bangladesh: 52%
West Indies: 61%
Zimbabwe: 90%
This means Australia win more matches as a percentage but also lose a lot more as a percentage. India in their overseas cycle of 2013-14 were never whitewashed and drew matches. Australia were whitewashed in their last tours of the UAE and SL. Conditions might seem to matter but like I said India has total mastery in slow and low conditions (which is more than 50% of the cricketing world). None of the non-SC teams have total mastery of non-SC swinging/seaming conditions. You don't have this one team which keeps winning everything in Aus, SA, Eng, NZ but isn't that good in Asia (which is what India is the mirror of now). If there was a team like that then that hypothetical team could be compared to India. The same SL that is being disparaged has a better W/L record than England in the past 4 years.
India haven't played a game outside of favourable conditions for nearly 2 years. They may be the best in the world but how tf would you know?
If you don't wan to talk about England v Australia there's a whole forum section that's not about the Ashes