harsh.ag
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It's relevant because of your insistence on your definition of rationality.Ok but how is that relevant at all to what we are discussing?
They were not competitive in that series. Saying "what if" and that they might be competitive if such and such happened is beyond irrelevant
Your response to that "one good session of batting" comment was:
"Suffice it to say that had they won a single Test in a 4 test series, where the opposition declares twice is not "competitive" in most people's books."
You have no idea what could have happened after that Indian win in the first test. Yet you chose to project the rest of the series as it happened anyways. That's irrational to many.