OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I said they're being stubborn. Not that they're wrong. Subtle difference. I'm stubborn too.Or they disagree with you about the definition of 'great'.
Who made you the king of adjectives
I said they're being stubborn. Not that they're wrong. Subtle difference. I'm stubborn too.Or they disagree with you about the definition of 'great'.
Who made you the king of adjectives
BurgeyIs there a 'necessary' stubborn?
He pretty much has been for at least the last five years tbf.Shakib should be the first name on the sheet in any Bangladesh ATXI if we make one now.
He was made the king of adjectives when his father, the previous king of adjectives died in the great "BIGLY" wars of 2017. It's so insensitive of you to bring it up.Or they disagree with you about the definition of 'great'.
Who made you the king of adjectives
He has crossed that stage long back. As of now, he is at the level of being the only ATG from Bangladesh. ATG or not is disputable.Shakib should be the first name on the sheet in any Bangladesh ATXI if we make one now.
Adverbs are crap.Bigly is an adverb.
Actually it's a proper noun - name of our neighbour's catBigly is an adverb.
From the top of my head, he almost single handedly won us against WI (2nd string side) and then contributed against Zimbabwe and England wins. Now this against SL. Not trying to nitpick but its not going to place him among the top ranks of ARs. Harsh but I think he has more abilities and more to give to Bangladesh. Maybe I expect more from him.Another great performance. Shakib's played in 8/9 of Banga's test wins. 8 matches, 732 runs @ 48.80 with 2 centuries, 46 wickets @ 20.32 with four 5 wicket hauls.
Without a doubt. His average touch above 40 also inflated by some not outs and flat pitches. Threw away his wicket countless times.And you should tbh.. Definitely under performed as a batsman
Averages 26 against India and England and has never played against Australia. Goes along way on CW not rating someone IMO. Unless people are catching his performances against NZ/Pakistan/SL/WI hes not done a thing.I'm struggling to understand why averaging 40 with the bat isn't enough for Shakib to be recognised as a great all-rounder when it is a significantly higher batting average than almost any other great all-rounder who was also a front-line bowler. I guess Dev, Botham and Hadlee were all rock-solid batsmen who consistently delivered on their potential.
Probably all a bit academic now as Shakib does seem to be transitioning into a batting all-rounder, but for most of his career his batting has been more than good enough to justify calling him an elite all-rounder, when you consider his bowling (and vice-versa.....which is exactly the point, he plays such a unique role in his side).
Shakib has been the most genuine of all-rounders throughout his career. All the other greats were mainly good at one thing.I'm struggling to understand why averaging 40 with the bat isn't enough for Shakib to be recognised as a great all-rounder when it is a significantly higher batting average than almost any other great all-rounder who was also a front-line bowler. I guess Dev, Botham and Hadlee were all rock-solid batsmen who consistently delivered on their potential.
Probably all a bit academic now as Shakib does seem to be transitioning into a batting all-rounder, but for most of his career his batting has been more than good enough to justify calling him an elite all-rounder, when you consider his bowling (and vice-versa.....which is exactly the point, he plays such a unique role in his side).