cnerd123
likes this
Id be upfront and rip into you but im sitting on 25 infraction points now so you'll have to be satisfied with aWW styles now with the eye-roll is it?
Id be upfront and rip into you but im sitting on 25 infraction points now so you'll have to be satisfied with aWW styles now with the eye-roll is it?
Not about the stats though. Kumara has been really impressive too. I'd imagine he'd have been even more effective if he'd bowled ahead of Mathews consistently and got a newer ball.I haven't seen him all series but off what I have seen this test he is beating the bat and troubling them
Lack of wickets doesn't mean he's bowling poorly. A couple of those catch the edge or best the inside edge and suddenly his stats look great
Leading from the front IMOHowever well he's bowling he should not be taking the new ball ahead of Pradeep/Kumara/Chameera/Lakmal. Which he has been doing all series.
Lol I noticed I received some for the first time the other day as a result of someone complaining. What does 5 mean? And how many required to get the boot?Id be upfront and rip into you but im sitting on 25 infraction points now so you'll have to be satisfied with a
Yeah, they count the same as a Philander or a Parnell.And to make matters more complicated, Amla, Maharaj and Shamsi are Indian rather than coloured, although for transformation purposes they count as non-black players of colour.
Not that there are any at the moment (I don't think), but what would a Chinese player be counted as? From what I remember, there was a bit of inconsistency as to how they were treated during apartheid, sometimes being regarded as non-white, but other times as "honorary whites".Yeah, they count the same as a Philander or a Parnell.
They were generally classified under the broad category of 'coloured' I believe. Only Japanese and Taiwanese businessmen were 'honorary whites'.Not that there are any at the moment (I don't think), but what would a Chinese player be counted as? From what I remember, there was a bit of inconsistency as to how they were treated during apartheid, sometimes being regarded as non-white, but other times as "honorary whites".
This only counts for Chinese people who lived in SA (or whose parents lived in SA) pre-1994. More recent immigrants don't count. So they aren't that cool.I have Chinese friends who would be so happy to know that in South Africa they are considered to be black. They suddenly become so much cooler
Officially all Chinese were given 'honourary-white' status in 1984/5 (because of confusion between the Taiwanese Chinese originally classified as white and the SA Chinese, born in SA, which were not).They were generally classified under the broad category of 'coloured' I believe. Only Japanese and Taiwanese businessmen were 'honorary whites'.
There was a court case a few years ago where a Chinese South African went to court about Chinese people not being able to benefit from BEE. The court found that Chinese do count as 'black' (as in non-white and therefore qualify for employment equity and BEE).
That depends and changes according to the needs of the elected party.I have Chinese friends who would be so happy to know that in South Africa they are considered to be black. They suddenly become so much cooler
and they have scored 17% of all Lanka's runs during the test series as openers lolKarunaratne and Silva's stats make for some gruesome reading and you feel their place would be threatened if they were in the Zimbabwe team.. but somehow they're always there. Why can't SL try someone else FFS?
Hasn’t got the numbers but I quite like Silva. He knows how to stick around and seems to value his wicket.Karunaratne and Silva's stats make for some gruesome reading and you feel their place would be threatened if they were in the Zimbabwe team.. but somehow they're always there. Why can't SL try someone else FFS?