If Kohli and Ashwin can be, why not Root and Anderson?Root AND Anderson can't both be home track bullies, make up your mind.
Haha yeah wtf.
Pretty sure no English fan would call 2010/11 "an isolated performance that means nothing"
Spark is Aussie and no they don't. There is a difference between being world class and an ATG. Steyn is indisputably the best fast bowler of the era and Anderson, Zak etc are in the tier below.What English fans think or don't think doesn't make a difference to me, no offense@Spark. Some of these blokes rate Anderson in the same ballpark as Steyn so excuse me if I don't put too much stock in their cricketing opinions and insights.
The majority of the English cricket pundits have sounded utterly bitter and ungracious in the aftermath of the India series. Botham on air was quick to mention how Kohli can be an ATG only if he succeeds in England or something to that effect but this is the same bloke who keeps talking about how Root is a "batsman for all conditions" with no caveats and no mention of his record in Australia and New Zealand(the latter of which is in the same ballpark as Kohli's in England).
By that logic, Kohli is the only one who's had a good series. Pujara, root, Bairstow all averaged around 50 and all had very good series by any standard.I don't think he is a home track bully at all but he s averaging 50 in a series where Ashwin averaged 44 with the bat. Context. You gotta look beyond the numbers sometimes... He has not had a good series, definitely not what you want from your #1 batsman. Averaging 50 in this series is not as much of an achievement as it might have been in some other conditions. It is not bad but it is not really that good either, esp. considering he got the best of the batting conditions 4 of the 5 tests.
I didn't realise he was Aussie but I knew he wasn't an English fan. Still thought it prudent to add no offense as I don't mean to offend anyone personally. And from what I have read some of them do seem to rate Anderson on par with Steyn. If he's rated alongside Zaheer then that's fair enough. He's not close to Steyn.Spark is Aussie and no they don't. There is a difference between being world class and an ATG. Steyn is indisputably the best fast bowler of the era and Anderson, Zak etc are in the tier below.
The point is it's not like Root had a great series. He had a decent series, nothing more nothing less. The pitches were flat and his best and only big score came in the drawn test on what was probably the flattest pitch all series. On such pitches you want to get a couple of hundreds to have a "good series". Not a bad series by any stretch of the imagination though. Some progress in making that away record better(esp. tons).By that logic, Kohli is the only one who's had a good series. Pujara, root, Bairstow all averaged around 50 and all had very good series by any standard.
I thought cook was seriously disappointing though... Not as though he didn't get runs, but he looked very unconvincing in most of his innings and had more than his fair share of luck.
I remember you predicted that Ashwin would end the series with 28 wickets in a thread which was made right after Eng lost to Bangladesh. Superb prediction since Ashwin managed only one wicket in the last test!Congratulations india
May I ask why you made the nickname 'Rootfan', when you spend almost your entire existence on here talking up Smith?FWIW I do rate Root. Just don't find it fair that he gets called as "the" batsman for all conditions when Smith and Kohli have far more complete records, Kohli's in England notwithstanding. Also think he isn't that good against spin and on proper turning pitches he will have problems. I'd also like to see him respond to out and out pace ala Steyn vs Kohli Jo'burg or Johnson vs Kohli..something he hasn't had to do till now.
And shitcanning Joe Root...........I've asked him this before and didn't get an answer. So I can only assume the Root is not "Joe Root" but as he's an Aussie it means ****ing.May I ask why you made the nickname 'Rootfan', when you spend almost your entire existence on here talking up Smith?
Either that or a genuine attempt to go under the pretense of being a Root-fan to appear impartial & quietly dig away, before giving their entire game away.I've asked him this before and didn't get an answer. So I can only assume the Root is not "Joe Root" but as he's an Aussie it means ****ing.