Ball tracker showed it going over.Taylor lucky by the sounds of it.
I was just coming on to post that. Must surely be trolling. Then again, Hamish Marshall does have a habit of being selected against all common sense, so maybe he's a lock.Don't worry guys, the answer to our middle order problem has been found:
Thanks Gaz Williams.
Jesus dude, he's not invincible. Even the best get out to great deliveries.The fact that he squared up his stance shows how early he was on that ball, it was a great ball, came towards him and seamed away, but it's the type of thing he used to be a master of soft handing down to the ground via gully. At the moment he's lost that in his game and he's getting out repeatedly in this fashion.
Why are you so emotional about it? You do realise pointing out that when a set batsman gets out to something they shouldn't have isn't an emotional issue right? You're not personally attached to his career, it's OK on an internet forum to pass critique.Jesus dude, he's not invincible. Even the best get out to great deliveries.
I honestly don't get the Hamish Marshall ridicule. His brother was pants, but Hamish was actually a pretty decent batsman for us - until he seemed to lose confidence in a hurry. His 146 against McGrath, Warne et al was a cracking knock. Don't take this post as advocating his recall though. The glory days of 2005 seem well gone.I was just coming on to post that. Must surely be trolling. Then again, Hamish Marshall does have a habit of being selected against all common sense, so maybe he's a lock.
That much is obvious each time you post.it's OK on an internet forum to pass critique.
Agree with this; I always thought he was decent. IIRC, he often got shuffled around the order, which wasn't fair in him.I honestly don't get the Hamish Marshall ridicule. His brother was pants, but Hamish was actually a pretty decent batsman for us - until he seemed to lose confidence in a hurry. His 146 against McGrath, Warne et al was a cracking knock. Don't take this post as advocating his recall though. The glory days of 2005 seem well gone.
WatYup, I guess acting like they're a personal family member just because they play for your national team, and being personally offended when someone points out a mistake/error that they make is a great way to involve yourself in internet discussions.
Marshall just your classic run of the mill mediocre NZ middle order player that we have seen countless times, not even being harsh. What I mean is that they fooled into "looking good" but providing no substance whatsoever. We are seeing this with Hamish Nicholls right now, they keep harping on about temperament this that but we are not seeing anything to back that up. To be fair though, Nicholls, much like Marshall are part of mostly trash batting lineup and Nicholls did have the great fortune of playing India IN India, where better men have come back questioning "what is cricket?".I honestly don't get the Hamish Marshall ridicule. His brother was pants, but Hamish was actually a pretty decent batsman for us - until he seemed to lose confidence in a hurry. His 146 against McGrath, Warne et al was a cracking knock. Don't take this post as advocating his recall though. The glory days of 2005 seem well gone.
Well it was more his ODI career that died a long lingering death to be fair ... two fifties in his last 31 innings, 15 single figure scores in there too.I honestly don't get the Hamish Marshall ridicule. His brother was pants, but Hamish was actually a pretty decent batsman for us - until he seemed to lose confidence in a hurry. His 146 against McGrath, Warne et al was a cracking knock. Don't take this post as advocating his recall though. The glory days of 2005 seem well gone.
I don't understand it either. Looking at his test career, he also got 76 in the first innings at Eden Park in that 2005 series, then 160 against Sri Lanka. It seems that he was subsequently promoted to open in tests, where he didn't fare too well (although he only played 13 tests in total). At school his brother would open and he would bat number 4. His ODI record was pretty good until it tailed off in 2005/2006 when he was moved down to 7 in the order.I honestly don't get the Hamish Marshall ridicule. His brother was pants, but Hamish was actually a pretty decent batsman for us - until he seemed to lose confidence in a hurry. His 146 against McGrath, Warne et al was a cracking knock. Don't take this post as advocating his recall though. The glory days of 2005 seem well gone.