That's a bit of a blind spot to the rules maybe IMO. Lbw is there because the ball would hit the stumps if the pad wasn't there, to stop you from just playing with the pad.Phew. Would be a bit rough to be given out for that tiny brush on the pad.
Do you get that where the first 3-4 years you watched cricket you remember everything incredibly clearly, year-by-year, then it all just blurs into one?Spark I did too. Doolan did well first bat if I'm remembering correctly.. Everything is a blur though these days though.
By that logic you could have your bat tucked behind your pad for every ball.That's a bit of a blind spot to the rules maybe IMO. Lbw is there because the ball would hit the stumps if the pad wasn't there, to stop you from just playing with the pad.
In a situation like that where you're middling it anyway seems very harsh for that to be out lbw, which it technically would be were the ball hitting the stumps.
One to think about
Surely that was better than decent.Quiney's 9?
How do you offociate that? Would make the lbw law far too subjective IMO.That's a bit of a blind spot to the rules maybe IMO. Lbw is there because the ball would hit the stumps if the pad wasn't there, to stop you from just playing with the pad.
In a situation like that where you're middling it anyway seems very harsh for that to be out lbw, which it technically would be were the ball hitting the stumps.
One to think about
Do you get that where the first 3-4 years you watched cricket you remember everything incredibly clearly, year-by-year, then it all just blurs into one?
If that's what you're talking about I get it too.
There's a bit of it that hangs out as a bit of a viewing platform I think, so maybe that was it?What's the deal with that bridge? Looks half finished on atial view.
Absolutely. Definitely not saying it should be changed outright, but it's interesting to think about being out lbw in that situation, and how counter to the point of the lbw law it is.How do you offociate that? Would make the lbw law far too subjective IMO.
Abbott's pace is well down too.Philander's got not much left in the tank atm. Not good signs with a new ball and 20 overs to go.
IIRC that doesn't matter any more as long as you've managed to intially ground the bat.Thought his bat bounced tbh
Loved Kepler's fielding as short leg during WSCDo you get that where the first 3-4 years you watched cricket you remember everything incredibly clearly, year-by-year, then it all just blurs into one?
If that's what you're talking about I get it too.