Nah, just batting takes priority.Well they did pick Mennie, so obviously the must bowl 140km rule is out the window.
Mark Reason and Joe Romano would beat the brakes off of any Aussie pundit in terms of sheer stupidity.Ah yeah fair call. Have heard things about NZ cricket pundits, but obviously I'm more exposed to Aussie ones.
England probably a bit different, perhaps because of class differences in cricketing culture compared to us.
I'd argue this is still the case... I've always felt Lyon got wickets due to the pressure and performance of other bowlers, now that pressure has gone off and suddenly he's back to being the average bowler he was previously... NZ picks a spinner for the sake of it, and Aussie seem to be falling into the same trap, you've got Steve Smith if you're really desperate for some spin overs and surely someone else in the Aussie line up can bowl some passable offies if needed.Yes, he was a joke. It was to the point where the two options on the table were to either drop Wade or stop bothering selecting a spinner.
If they want an 'allrounder' then I assume MMarsh'll come back in. I desperately do not want that to happen though.After hearing about the flaws in Bancroft's record, I'm inclined to stick with Burns to partner Warner - then have a fresh look when SMarsh is fit
What will happen at number 6? I think they're more inclined to want an all-rounder in Adelaide
And I think I'm more inclined to want Ferrari.I think they're more inclined to want an all-rounder in Adelaide
You've already blown my likes budget for today. Perhaps it is time you and your son played for Australia.I'd suggest if you're going to have a sook about that then you don't belong in a test team. Sorry, I know that sounds harsh but to me it rings true.
Apparently there are 8 players who were paid $1 million plus by CA last yearI'd suggest if you're going to have a sook about that then you don't belong in a test team. Sorry, I know that sounds harsh but to me it rings true.
Rogers spoke about him on the ABC the other day and basically said real talent, great against the faster bowlers but needs to do a lot of work against spinWhat are people's thoughts on Jake Lehmann? FC average of 48, and coming off a century in his most recent Shield match.
Thanks for thatRogers spoke about him on the ABC the other day and basically said real talent, great against the faster bowlers but needs to do a lot of work against spin
Seemed to me that he was basically saying "wait a few years."
I saw Wade said Peter Handscomb should play. His record over the last few seasons looks pretty good, any chance of him being picked?Thanks for that
So it seems the general consensus on these boards is that Patterson should come in, but none of the other bats (including Bancroft and Lehmann) are deserving at this point
The least you could do is post your side for the 3rd test then.Rod Marsh has resigned effective immediately as selector.
I'm just writing away to CA to apply for the job.