• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia in Sri Lanka 2016

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
both more in the batting AR class and have bucketloads of wickets compared to the names I mentioned


Throw some more names at me in the vein of Ricky Ponting
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Spin is harder to master simply because it requires greater mental strength and energy. Fast bowling takes more toll physically.. Nothing s easier than the other.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I agree with you on the more physicality part


I feel they both take equal mental strength, obviously different reasons though. I know you have to be brave to keep tossing up the ball if you're getting hit for sixes, but pace isn't all physical. the old 'all quickies are dumb meatheads' stereotype is silly
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Where did I say that? And spin bowling requires a lot of physical effort too. I just meant that spinners face the bigger challenge mentally while fast bowlers face the bigger challenge physically.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Collingwood best in Tests are 3fer 30 odd and he took his wickets at 60. Not convinced he is a great counterpoint
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Collingwood best in Tests are 3fer 30 odd and he took his wickets at 60. Not convinced he is a great counterpoint
I only brought up Mathews because he came on and took 2 wickets with mediums in a match where mr_mister felt that spin was unfairly dominating.

There are no counter examples because the part time spinner who has a good day is naturally a feature of spin as oppose to pace. If you are capable of bowling pace then you need to keep practicing it to stay in that physical condition and so it becomes a more prominent part of your game. What this has to do with the inherent qualities of pace over spin I have no idea.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Of course it's easier to bowl spin to a competent level as opposed to pace.

It doesn't help mr mister's earlier argument at all though imo
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Steven Smith: We didn't excite well enough with the ball or in the field today.
Pardon?

I don't think that's the right word Steven. I for one find Australia getting smashed quite exciting.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
both more in the batting AR class and have bucketloads of wickets compared to the names I mentioned


Throw some more names at me in the vein of Ricky Ponting
A part time seamer like Ponting is almost never going to get conditions in his favour and if he did, would have at least 3 and possibly 4 frontline options ahead of him in the queue.

Whereas if a decent part time spinner gets good bowling conditions he'll probably only have 1 or 2 players competing with him and if you offer something different (Clarke being a SLA offers something different if you've picked Warne and Lyon).

Pretty sure Clarke's 6for came when Australia's team balance was 3 seamers to Hauritz, so as soon as they worked out it was a bunsen Clarke was going to get loads of overs. It would be borderline incompetence for a similar situation to arise for Ponting.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
A part time seamer like Ponting is almost never going to get conditions in his favour and if he did, would have at least 3 and possibly 4 frontline options ahead of him in the queue.

Whereas if a decent part time spinner gets good bowling conditions he'll probably only have 1 or 2 players competing with him and if you offer something different (Clarke being a SLA offers something different if you've picked Warne and Lyon).

Pretty sure Clarke's 6for came when Australia's team balance was 3 seamers to Hauritz, so as soon as they worked out it was a bunsen Clarke was going to get loads of overs. It would be borderline incompetence for a similar situation to arise for Ponting.
Having said that, didn't Jonathan Trott take a First Class 7for a few years ago?
 

Migara

International Coach
Lol no think how much more often that happens with part-time spinners though. Clarke, Border, North, Katich, Bevan all have test 6 fers. How many does Brett Lee or Andrew Flintoff have?
That is because there are rougly 2-3 times more seamers in a team and wickets get distributed among them in helpful conditions.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pretty sure Clarke's 6for came when Australia's team balance was 3 seamers to Hauritz, so as soon as they worked out it was a bunsen Clarke was going to get loads of overs
Agree with everything but just saying Clarke only bowled 6 overs when he took his 6 for
 

Top