Am I missing something here?>"no point whinging about the pitch"
>spends the rest of the post whinging about the pitch
huh?>"no point whinging about the pitch"
>spends the rest of the post whinging about the pitch
That's not how I read it - more a case of ripping into sides' inability to play in different conditions.>"no point whinging about the pitch"
>spends the rest of the post whinging about the pitch
I think he just hates you.huh?
You have trouble with comprehending English or are you talking about someone else?
dw I love myself enough for the both of usI think he just hates you.
Ridiculous really.Just because Dan Jameson had me curious, if Voges scored 5 ducks in a row in his next 5 innings he'd still average a tick over 60 and obviously you'd have to drop him if he was in that kind of slump and probably never pick him again
There's nearly no chance Voges won't end up with the second best batting average of all time (min 20 innings)
Hey heard of this thing called the internet? Try it's cool.Da **** has gone on here?? Just got home from work and turned the tv on, have i had another 24 hour blackout??
This reminded me of your topic on the curious case of Vinod KambliJust because Dan Jameson had me curious, if Voges scored 5 ducks in a row in his next 5 innings he'd still average a tick over 60 and obviously you'd have to drop him if he was in that kind of slump and probably never pick him again
There's nearly no chance Voges won't end up with the second best batting average of all time (min 20 innings)
I'm not convinced that ducks in 5 innings gets him dropped. Other than "why the **** not?" Shaun Marsh, who would they call up?Just because Dan Jameson had me curious, if Voges scored 5 ducks in a row in his next 5 innings he'd still average a tick over 60 and obviously you'd have to drop him if he was in that kind of slump and probably never pick him again
There's nearly no chance Voges won't end up with the second best batting average of all time (min 20 innings)
I'm not convinced that ducks in 5 innings gets him dropped. Other than "why the **** not?" Shaun Marsh, who would they call up?
The point stands though, he'll almost certainly average over 60, explaining that he's not that good to the next generation is gonna be a pain.
haha surely 5 ducks in a row would be enough to get most people dropped who aren't captains or legends. Voges isn't seen as that valuable IMO
they could either blood Jake Lehmann young or try to replicate the Voges situation with a brief 10 test career for Michael Klinger
Just remind them back in the 2010s when test match cricket was in its death throes that there used to be a team called the West IndiesI'm not convinced that ducks in 5 innings gets him dropped. Other than "why the **** not?" Shaun Marsh, who would they call up?
The point stands though, he'll almost certainly average over 60, explaining that he's not that good to the next generation is gonna be a pain.
Mike Hussey stands out from that list as being a very good test batsmen.haha I really am fascinated by situations like this where someone has an insanely good start to their career like Kambli, Adams, Hussey and now Voges
Look what happens when they keep someone in the side after their use by date and allow their average to slowly drop (Jimmy Adams) they're remembered as a completey **** batsman.