indiaholic
International Captain
His bouncers you doofus.What actually is an effort ball?
His bouncers you doofus.What actually is an effort ball?
The ones where he tried to not chuck itWhat actually is an effort ball?
Don't know what you expected to find in a thread called "Jonbrooks chucking megathread" tbh*Opens thread* *Finds discussion on Murali chucking* *closes thread*
All I know is Muralitharan was the biggest phony and chucker of all time. Beside SL fans and prolly some other ******s no else gives him any legitimacy.
It's not possible to bowl at all without straightening the arm ftr, so you are right on this. Rest of the posts is rubbish though.I don't believe it's possible to bowl the doosra without straightening the arm.
Bishan is an idiot who was never as good as Ashwin, Bhajji or Kumble and the spin quartet was over rated as ****. **** him. His attempts to stay relevant in this age is pathetic and amusing.Nah, Murali chucked. I don't believe it's possible to bowl the doosra without straightening the arm. Some of the concrete arm testing shows he was legit but how was he in match conditions. Who is to say he didn't straighten his arm.
I also don't agree with the current cricket laws which have the chucking at 15 degrees. It should be based on velocity.
The doosra should be outlawed. I have no issue with the straight one but the doosra is just a wrong delivery. Bishan speaks sense on this.
Wow, what an insightful explanation that will help to improve knowledge of the forummers exponentialy, good on you mate.All I know is Muralitharan was the biggest phony and chucker of all time. Beside SL fans and prolly some other ******s no else gives him any legitimacy.
One is not allowed to straighten arm 'above shoulder' beyond 15 degrees.It's not possible to bowl at all without straightening the arm ftr, so you are right on this. Rest of the posts is rubbish though.
Odd that you don't have the same LOL feeling when some say "Chucker, chucker"I always have a quiet lol when people vehemently state that "Murali was proven to have a legal action . . . proven!"
Irrelevant now IMO. Guy was a good player and had a great career, arguing about it now is pointless.
post reported for reporting that you reported the postJust reported your post bud.
Not for calling me a dumbass. It was just ****.
I doOdd that you don't have the same LOL feeling when some say "Chucker, chucker"
If it was irrelevant this thread would be about 100 pages back by now - it is true that his basic action was proved to be fair, and then the law was tweaked to allow him to bowl a doosra. It shouldn't have been though and Pratters is right - that delivery should have no place in the gameI always have a quiet lol when people vehemently state that "Murali was proven to have a legal action . . . proven!"
Irrelevant now IMO. Guy was a good player and had a great career, arguing about it now is pointless.