He is a mega dolt to be fair. Even made me change my avatar.Mods change the name of this thread. Nothing mega about it
Emotion isn't the only thing most of these arguments are devoid of.I just think the wording should be correct and devoid of emotion for an argument like this.
Just reported your post bud.Hahahahaha! You dumbass! The mods were the ones who change it to mega chucking thread in the first place!
my favourite bit about this is jonbrooks liking ityeah jono you dumbass
FTR this is all rubbish too. He was called for his standard offbreak.Murali's action for the most part looks just fine. In fact it is a lot better than some of the bowlers out there. It's only certain deliveries when his action changes completely e.g. big off break and doosra.
Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.FTR this is all rubbish too. He was called for his standard offbreak.
If you don't like it, I'm sorry.Just reported your post bud.
Not for calling me a dumbass. It was just ****.
This is the posting equivalent of a tailender winding up for a big slog and then halfway through his downswing, thinking better of it and meekly patting the ball back to the bowler.If you don't like it, I'm sorry.
Nope. Literally not true unless you define the words "changes" and/or "completely" differently to everyone else.Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.
He looks anything but normal no matter what he deliversWhich is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.
It also implies Murali couldn't conceal his variations at all yet still managed to fool international batsmen.Nope. Literally not true unless you define the words "changes" and/or "completely" differently to everyone else.
It is absolutely true and you are blind if you don't see this.Nope. Literally not true unless you define the words "changes" and/or "completely" differently to everyone else.
Not all. Quite the contrary.It also implies Murali couldn't conceal his variations at all yet still managed to fool international batsmen.
Gifs/Video plz or GTFO.It is absolutely true and you are blind if you don't see this.
Whoa, I'm convinced!Not all. Quite the contrary.
What actually is an effort ball?Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.