I'm sure he could've been if he'd wanted to be, but he decided to be fair on the rest of the world's Cricketing nations and not be an ambidextrous God amongst men.TOTAB not an off spinner tbf.
You're a couple of years too late with that suggestion. She's forgotten how to do it as of recent times.get ronda rousey to put them in an arm bar
How so? If anything it's the opposite. The testing worked for him because it confirmed he was chucking.He's a great example for the 'testing doesn't work' brigade to use
Lots of people have argued in this thread that it doesn't actually prevent anyone from chucking because once they pass the rehab they go back and start chucking again.How so? If anything it's the opposite. The testing worked for him because it confirmed he was chucking.
I see. I guess you can't really argue against that can you?Lots of people have argued in this thread that it doesn't actually prevent anyone from chucking because once they pass the rehab they go back and start chucking again.
until they can monitor bowling actions in game with acceptable accuracy I can't see any form of testing really doing anything to prevent chucking other than appease people, or allow the authorities to say "hey at least we tried".There is also the argument that since they don't test 'clean' looking bowlers (or if they do, these results are not public) so we don't know if the testing is actually working as it should. It could be widely inconsistent (test the same bowler twice, get two different results) or it could be way inaccurate (everyone might be found to be exceeding limits if tested)
Hafeez passing and then failing repeatedly would suggest that any rehab he does to his action just doesn't stick, or that he's bowling the same way throughout except sometimes he passes and sometimes he fails - the tests are inconsistent.