NZ supporters on this site are quite a bit like Indian supporters in real life
not surprised that when they actually get a decent player they go overboard. I reckon most of them actually believe the hype the spout as well.
Not sure it's much different to any batsman who was the stand-out across all forms in a particular calendar year, especially considering he faced both England & Aust attacks away.I don't let what other people think alter my opinion on players but i certainly think Williamson is getting massively over rated here.
You can be good and you can still be over rated.Not sure it's much different to any batsman who was the stand-out across all forms in a particular calendar year, especially considering he faced both England & Aust attacks away.
Ironically if anyone's overrated him, it's was the Aust Channel 9 team & the greater Australian media who gushed over him like you would believe in the recent series, leading to this piece of utter sensationalism from the Sydney Morning Herald comparing him to Bradman... Is New Zealand batsman Kane Williamson better than Don Bradman? And this from Allan Border No Cookies | Fox Sports News, Live Sport, Sports | Fox Sports
We're relatively mild here in comparison.
As I said, I'm not sure there's anymore hype here on CW (the point you specifically made), than there is anywhere else atm. I posted a couple from the Australia media above, the English raved about him in their summer and even the Boom-boom-umar-is-blackbradman PP forum spares plenty of hype for KW.You can be good and you can still be over rated.
I think he is good in fact very good but lets stop comparing him to every Tom, Dick and Chappell until he gets some longevity going.
Marsh Family video packages.Hey Channel 9 need to generate hype anyway they can in a summer where we've got WI coming for 3 tests
I was about to bring this up actually. AB, Younis and maybe Amla are the only batsmen knocking around who can legit say they've 'arrived' at greatness and don't have that much left to prove. Smith and Williamson have a few years yet.Yeah he's no Steve Smith yet
Dunno about that. I'm pretty sure i can do a simple google search on KW vs Virat and find out that large number of Indians on the internet would fancy ViratAs I said, I'm not sure there's anymore hype here on CW (the point you specifically made), than there is anywhere else atm. I posted a couple from the Australia media above, the English raved about him in their summer and even the Boom-boom-umar-is-blackbradman PP forum spares plenty of hype for KW.
So yeah, it's possible he's overrated, but it seems to be a universal thing, not a specific cricketweb feen as you suggest.
Fanboi more than troll, but whatever. You're accurate.those people are kiwiviktor, a few drive bys and dan the australian having a troll though
It's generally accepted on here that kane is top five at worst, and is in the argument for #1 along with several others.
my favourite part about the chappell v kane debate is greg chappell would destabilise and drop himself to make way for the younger talent.
Selective hearing problems...Sachin has his dark side, I am pretty sure.