FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Yeah it's the stat highlight thing on cricinfo at the moment. Last time a top three scored this many 100s in a series was India vs West Indies in 1978, in a 6 test series.For real? Geez.
Yeah it's the stat highlight thing on cricinfo at the moment. Last time a top three scored this many 100s in a series was India vs West Indies in 1978, in a 6 test series.For real? Geez.
Yeah, bit of an exaggeration to say the attack is swing-or-bust, but Plan B clearly missing on this tour.Did pretty well in UAIstan though. Both Trent and Tim had a fair bit success in the sub continent too
I don't think it should be revised. If it is marginal then it should be umpire's call. That's what they're there for. Overall the 50/50s will even out over time. DRS is there for the howlers e.g. inside edge on to pad given out lbw etc.Yep, 'umpires call' allows the same event (ball clipping) to be treated differently depending on the umpires imperfect reaction. I think most here agree it should be revised.
Such hackneyed cliches.Jesus Christ, quit being such a a whining sook. Just ****ing dire posting.
That's cos the ball swung. It is not swinging in Australia.Did pretty well in UAIstan though. Both Trent and Tim had a fair bit success in the sub continent too
All out attack doesn't really suit this attack either tbh, with line-and-length swing bowlers. They really should be looking to emulate Anderson/Broad who are much more fond of the squeeze, rather than trying to blast batsmen out with magic balls and hyper-attacking fields.Yeah, bit of an exaggeration to say the attack is swing-or-bust, but Plan B clearly missing on this tour.
Personally I think McCullum, and the team to a lesser extent, bought into the hype that all out attack a la Steve Waugh era Aus is the only way to go, forgetting that the patience game was something that actually served them well in places like the Windies and the UAE.
Provided you get more consistent and accurate decisions that's not really a concern for me at this level.Possibly, but the alternative is the Umps just become mere ornaments who stand their to hold the bowlers cap and sweater (considering no-balls can be checked on wickets.) If that's what you want, then you should make it clear and say so.
Look, I'd have no technology (for LBWs) and accept it as part of the game, rather than deal with the vagaries of a computer system (I understand that's not in keeping with the professional environment...but it seems like we debate said computer system as an alternative to competency of umpires.). And I'd also have one unsuccessful review.Possibly, but the alternative is the Umps just become mere ornaments who stand their to hold the bowlers cap and sweater (considering no-balls can be checked on wickets.) If that's what you want, then you should make it clear and say so.
Don't. ****ing. Review. Marginal. Decisions.Completely agree on the context of the game, but I still think it needs amending to at least not losing your review. The nonsense Burns one, no doubt we needed to lose.
QuitI feel a little sorry for Boult and Southee. So good in the right conditions. Masterly in fact. Yet these conditions do not suit bowlers of their type. What do ya do?
In Boult's case, in particular, not bowling like a drain tends to help.I feel a little sorry for Boult and Southee. So good in the right conditions. Masterly in fact. Yet these conditions do not suit bowlers of their type. What do ya do?
What you do is have a plan B i.e. bowl to a field, bowl in the correct channels, don't give the batsmen easy runs etc. They have not been doing this. Both Southee and Boult have been guilty of bowling all over the place. I haven't been watching (too painful) but have they put the pitch map up for Southee and Boult's bowling? I seriously doubt you'd find a good concentration of balls in any one given area.I feel a little sorry for Boult and Southee. So good in the right conditions. Masterly in fact. Yet these conditions do not suit bowlers of their type. What do ya do?
You'd do the same if you were an international captain my man. Hence why I said make it one review, so they don't.Don't. ****ing. Review. Marginal. Decisions.
Simple.