OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Comical
yep and they're still 5 down2 dropped catches and 2 no balls on wickets. Lol.
We had this discussion before. They need to take it away from the standing umpire.I half blame the umpires for these growing number of no ball wickets - half of them aren't bothered to reguarly call no balls anymore and as a result soome bowlers get into a habit of bowling them without the boot up the backside the umpire should be giving them.
Yeah, I think Clarke should remain for the entire 2015/16 summer.Can't really see them asking Clarke to retire after what is really just one poor series. The signs have definitely been there for a while before that but he's not that old (as in not necessarily about to retire) and he scored a hundred in his last home test so I just think it'll take longer for it to reach that point for him. Especially since Voges and Rogers are already likely to be out, which means there's at least one batting spot opening up already, and Marsh hasn't exactly cemented his place (either Marsh).
If a new player or two comes into the side and makes runs and he's not performing by the home summer, and Australia lose a test at some point during that summer, then he might be gone.
No. A couple of his best innings (Cape Town, Galle) have been where he's just smashed his way through tough batting conditions.did anyone find Clarke's "being aggressive against good bowling is the only way, live by the sword die by the sword" comments yesterday really weird? Like surely he doesn't genuinely believe that?
Rogers will be gone for the day night test whatever though won't he?Yeah, I think Clarke should remain for the entire 2015/16 summer.
I also think M Marsh or S Watson should bat 6.
I also think C Rogers needs to keep his word and retire.
Selectors don't pick the captain, do they? I thought it was the CA Board that did that.if Clarke remains, is he still captain or do the selectors take it off him for Smith?
Cannot see the pink ball? He said he would retire before the series anyway. I was facetiously picking what I believe would be the weaker team to play NZ, so don't take my post too seriously.Rogers will be gone for the day night test whatever though won't he?
Actually there generally aren't many no balls in international (and actually lower level) cricket these days compared to the past.I half blame the umpires for these growing number of no ball wickets - half of them aren't bothered to reguarly call no balls anymore and as a result soome bowlers get into a habit of bowling them without the boot up the backside the umpire should be giving them.
Sometimes, depending on the bowler's action, it is easier to see standing further back. And they are not standing much further back (if at all) anyway.We had this discussion before. They need to take it away from the standing umpire.
The reasons they don't call them nowadays is
a) they're standing so much further back now than they used to because they don't want to get hit.
b) they don't want to call the marginals because if they call a no ball when it's a legit delivery and a wicket falls there is no redress.
Solution IMO is to move the square leg umpire as all he ever does on the runouts is signal upstairs nowadays.