It's such an indictment that we're getting hammered like so with such large chunks of England's side doing ****-all.Sketchy keeping, no runs for a while. I love Jos but he isn't a sure thing at all, I'd give him the winter but it is a massive couple of series for so many of our young players.
Not sure who this randomly douchey and sarcastic comment is aimed at, but I'm saying what I think will happen, not arguing that it's necessarily the right call. I think dropping Clarke is justifiable, though I also think keeping him around during a period of transition when other new batsmen will be joining the team is reasonable. Not sure what the rest of your post has to do with Clarke.Yeah, I think Clarke should remain for the entire 2015/16 summer.
I also think M Marsh or S Watson should bat 6.
I also think C Rogers needs to keep his word and retire.
Johnson has to keep batting at 8 with no Faulkner.
It will be wonderful for Antipodean cricket.
Cook's done a job tbf in terms of seeing off the new ball semi-regularly.Yeah our bowling unit has largely been great/you've batted badly which is the large difference. Aside from Root and Moeen (who has been unlucky that he bats 8 meaning he has had to swing with the tail in some innings) none of our bats have done that well.
It really has been a funny series in that sense. I feel like most of the players on both sides have been fairly crap and each test has been decided by 1-3 brilliant performances. And other than Broad and Root, none of the match deciding performers have really followed up in any other test. Rogers has been consistent for Australia I guess, but that's it. England have had more of the big performances and more players (Cook, Stokes, Moeen) who have been pretty solid throughout the series without dominating, but there's been lots of poor performances overall.It's such an indictment that we're getting hammered like so with such large chunks of England's side doing ****-all.
When was this? I don't claim to have watched his whole career but I've not seen him this terrible. Been this way for a while too. The uae tour was a shocker for him.Clarke has looked this bad before, it's worth noting. His injury problems and the way he approaches his innings sometimes means that when he looks bad, he looks absolutely awful.
10-11 Ashes I would guess he's referring toWhen was this? I don't claim to have watched his whole career but I've not seen him this terrible. Been this way for a while too. The uae tour was a shocker for him.
I don't count the UAE tour as part of this same patch tbf because it's split by the Adelaide test and the WC (where he looked fine tbh, just surplus to requirements half the time). But he looked pretty terrible in patches of the 2010/11 Ashes, the back end of the 2013 Ashes when Broad got a hold of him etc etc. There are more examples than that.When was this? I don't claim to have watched his whole career but I've not seen him this terrible. Been this way for a while too. The uae tour was a shocker for him.
His batting was very poor, but he bowled well. Australia just panicked and tried to pack the batting order.Dropping MMarsh is a real head scratcher, did he look hopeless at Edgbaston? Yes but most of the rest of the side did and he is 23, has bowled ok and clearly has talent. No idea what kind of thought process makes you want 3 seamers in England when one of your bowlers is largely 4 overs maximum.
That is a ridiculous stat.Test Match Special @bbctms
Adam Voges is 42* - the highest score by an Australian between numbers 4-6 in this series... bbc.in/1K6JFgM pic.twitter.com/nRx4zCKZAl
genuinely amazing.
The series summed up in a statistic. Australia's tail are out batting their middle order.Test Match Special @bbctms
Adam Voges is 42* - the highest score by an Australian between numbers 4-6 in this series... bbc.in/1K6JFgM pic.twitter.com/nRx4zCKZAl
genuinely amazing.