Are Burley, Neville or Henry ex-Liverpool players? You're not really following the news or the articles written if you think it is only Liverpool affiliated people. In fact, of anyone that's discussed the issue I am not sure I have heard anyone defend it.
What you've basically said is: he doesn't want to go into a situation where he himself has made any stay untenable. Well, that's the ****ing point. I'd say 9/10 Liverpool fans want him gone, it's not about that at this stage. But he should still have the professionalism to get on with it while he's here. He's signed a contract that he's already agreed to honour. The continuous side-shows just indicate a huge lack of respect and class.
I think as a United fan you're probably happy about any bad press for Liverpool and that's why you're missing the point. You just want to pass it off as "those whinging scousers again".
Really? OK I'll give you Henry, I didn't realise anyone listened to Burley anymore, certainly impossible to find a quote online, but
Neville has been ready to pan Liverpool rather than Stirling. Lineker has come out to defend him too. Alan Shearer has said nothing interesting, struggling to think who else would fall in the non-Liverpool brigade who I've heard on the issue.
And that's not what I've said. You have to take in context all I've said on the issue, not one post. IMO he's not made a situation by demanding to leave, the situations been made by the fact the club has gone hugely backwards over the last 12 months, in fact bar one season with Suarez (promptly sold and not replaced with anyone half as good), they've not challenged for honours at all in Sterlings time there. Add the clubs regression to the fact its clear he's lost faith in the managers ability (the manager who got rightly derided for putting him at wing-back), and the situation has not so much been made by one person but come to a head where club and player are too far apart.
You talk about 'professionalism' and 'honouring a contract'. Were forgetting footballers are humans too. I'm sure if any of us signed a contract with a company and they went to pot over the next 12 months we'd want out and start looking for better businesses to work for. Many of us would actually quit (if we could afford it) rather than spend a day at a company thats going wrong, surrounded by people who know you don't want to be there but insist on telling you to stay, or maybe resent you for wanting out. Its a spiteful atmosphere and few of us would stick it, even take the financial hit to leave and protect our mental/emotional wellbeing. Yet footballers aren't allowed to think like that. They
must turn up and give 110% in training everyday and bloody well swallow it if the club wont sell, because they can't just walk away like other humans can. And we, as fellow humans, expect that too, like working for a football club has a level of loyalty tied into the contract that no other employer has. It's not like Sterling owes them an apprenticeship or years of support and development, they signed him as a (admittedly young) commodity, not because they loved his cheeky ****ney jib.
End of the day the kid is massively unhappy for one reason or the other, be it he wants more money (christ don't we all?), or more sucess. Either way, having a go at him for not wanting to go into an environment thats probably going to do nothing but depress him (oh no, footballers can't be depressed, because they are
so rich) is uncalled for IMO.
I'd agree with fining him his wages whilst he's not turning up, that's fair enough, and would happen to the rest of us going AWOL, but if a person doesn't want to go work in an environment, and is willing to take the financial hit, then I support them.
Also, saying I want to pass it off as 'whinging scousers', well, it doesn't help thats how they, the pundits not the club, come across. Lawrenson was all player power when Lallana wanted to move from Southampton to Liverpool, but when its on the other foot he's quick to slate Sterling. It comes across as petulant and childish, and he's not the only ex-Liverpool player to do so. I don't actually see any of it as bad press for Liverpool as a club - player wants to leave, club doesn't want him to, happens to every team - but its the pundits chucking their comments in and savaging Sterling just because he wants to leave Liverpool that's the bad press. The way the actual club has handled things has been done in the correct fashion TBH.