I think MJ is the only one I'm concerned about but im hoping like you said he has dialed it back due to conditions.There's absolutely nothing new about quicks backing off the pace on slow decks, even Lee had to on occasion and every quick worth their salt has a slow deck game. If the conditions don't merit express bowling but you keep trying to muscle the batsmen, that's not good bowling and even average bats will make you pay. Making the batsmen wait that fraction longer for the ball is good cricket under these conditions, especially since that extra bit of time in the air will give you more movement. I don't know the injury status of these guys but that they're down on pace isn't, for mine, indicative of anything other than team-focussed professional Test bowling.
72/7, 2rpo, 5 wickets in the first session. How is this worrisome exactly?
I remember reading once that NZ attracted the lowest crowds and that factored against them with tests and location. But you can't build a road roady enough for this WI team to last past 3 days.What was the worst boxing day test crowd in the last decade?
Because who the hell in Australia will show up to watch this shower try to crawl to 200?
I thought there was a big crowd for our last Boxing Day test in 89? That was the 'Dyer the Liar' test where Whitney and McDermott 'survived' (the LBW law was suspended during the last few overs) in heroic fashion. Part of Australian folklore.I remember reading once that NZ attracted the lowest crowds and that factored against them with tests and location. But you can't build a road roady enough for this WI team to last past 3 days.
Nope. Starc has leapfrogged MJ. A few good series 12 months ago doesn't trump 12 months of constant domination and superiority. MJ has been ordinary for a while now. Starc is a shoe-in (depending on warm ups and injuries obviously).It's really quite simple. Starc misses out. It's not like Harris is returning from injury. Haze can't be dropped, MJ has got money in the bank and it can't be reasonably assumed that Starc will outperform MJ, or the others, even if he has in this tour. I hope we don't make this complicated. Thank goodness Marsh didn't ton up
hahaHaze won't be getting dropped for the Ashes but I know who might be https://twitter.com/Jesse_Hogan/status/610157315585646592
Edit: I'm aware that he's not a normal commentator for any company with the rights to the Ashes, but the joke still stands.
Starc was pathetic in the last test series against India. Only 2 tests against a hapless WI top-order doesn't change anything, especially when Johnson wasn't bad either.Nope. Starc has leapfrogged MJ. A few good series 12 months ago doesn't trump 12 months of constant domination and superiority. MJ has been ordinary for a while now. Starc is a shoe-in (depending on warm ups and injuries obviously).
Nope. Starc has leapfrogged MJ. A few good series 12 months ago doesn't trump 12 months of constant domination and superiority. MJ has been ordinary for a while now. Starc is a shoe-in (depending on warm ups and injuries obviously).
neither of these posts are good postsStarc was pathetic in the last test series against India. Only 2 tests against a hapless WI top-order doesn't change anything, especially when Johnson wasn't bad either.
This one is the worst among the 3.neither of these posts are good posts
No, its not. His farewell series against England was poor. It was a " time to blood some young blokes" decision which has not worked.the chanders dropping is looking fishier and fishier by the minute
Chanderpaul at age 60 will still be better than some of these spuds.No, its not. His farewell series against England was poor. It was a " time to blood some young blokes" decision which has not worked.
Johnson vs Starc IMHO it has to be one or the other as on a bad day they are both very bad and you cant afford both. Interesting the comment Johnson "throttled it back" against India because apart from the innings when he destroyed the middle order his main role was frightening out the tailenders.
Would start the Ashes with Johnson tho'