Been injured I think, which is his wont, I'm afraid, mind you Wood isn't much better.What happened to liam plunkett? Thought he was making his comeback last summer.
Anyone noticed the Woakes fans don't go crying to the media depending on where he bats? **** the WACA ton, that's enough to have him ahead in the pecking order IMO.just drop the ****er
Nope.He was obviously taking the piss. If every newbie who played a poor shot was dropped instantly, we'd have about half as many great batsmen.
Shai Hope is the next in line, he's more technically correct than Blackwood, a very good prospect. Still, you can't drop him for that, he's had a great start to his test career and he's faced some tough opposition. If he does something equally boneheaded in Grenada then I'd agree but for now he needs to play.Nope.
I don't keep up with much domestic cricket around the world but if there's reasonable depth in the West Indies then I'd drop Blackwood.
Maybe in the East Indies, perhaps in the South Indies. Certainly not the North Indies, but the West Indies? OutrageousNope.
I don't keep up with much domestic cricket around the world but if there's reasonable depth in the West Indies then I'd drop Blackwood.
You have to look Test class to end up with fans in the first place... :Anyone noticed the Woakes fans don't go crying to the media depending on where he bats? **** the WACA ton, that's enough to have him ahead in the pecking order IMO.
Plunkett cough cough.You have to look Test class to end up with fans in the first place... :
Nah, I've said in this thread that I wouldn't play Stokes in the next Test with Ali back. I just don't think it does any good to be trying to stuff him in the side in any which spot, which was done in the Indian series last year. Woakes should always play ahead of Stokes if you're talking about a number 8.
Because he'd be the #9. (Moeen, Buttler, Woakes, Plunkett, Broad, Anderson)Plunkett cough cough.
Seeing as he has looked the most threatening of all the bowlers used in the last 12 months outside the new ball pair and could bat at 8 anyway why not pick him?
TBF to Plunkers, and I used to be one of his biggest detractors Version 2.0 looks pretty decent. Would still rather we give Wood a go. I must admit I thought Liam was Injured, but he did play all the Lions games I see, wouldn't hate it if he had a go.Is there really no one better than Jordan or Plunkett at bowling?
I was meaning for today, as you could have Stokes, Buttler, Plunkett, Tredwell, Broad and Anderson if they deemed Moeen not yet fit enough to bowl the overs required. Might be irrelevant anyway if Tredders is injured.Because he'd be the #9. (Moeen, Buttler, Woakes, Plunkett, Broad, Anderson)
Why on earth would you pick Rashid ahead of Moeen? Other than rabid bias of course.I'd like to see them go with
Lyth
Cook
lance
ot
Bell
Stokes
Rashid
Buttler
Plunkett
Broad
Anderson
We know the pitch is flat, and we're going to need good bowlers to get anything out of it. 5 quality batsmen plus batting very low will get us enough runs (number 10 has a test match 170), and even if Rashid is not considered the finished product yet, just give him his chance and he may be the future, we know for sure Treadwell isn't.
Only England could persist with a makeshift opener who was good 2 years ago, over an actual opener, who as good as won his side the championship last year, and is still young enough to have a good future as an England batsman.
TBF to him at least he hasn't got Bairstow coming in for Buttler....Why on earth would you pick Rashid ahead of Moeen? Other than rabid bias of course.