Prince EWS
Global Moderator
There was a nightwatchman.Buttler shouldn't be batting so low down the order.
There was a nightwatchman.Buttler shouldn't be batting so low down the order.
Yeah, it's a real shame that one.What a rubbish dismissal. Awful shot to give away the chance of a ton.
Probably better to not have a night watch man when there is just the tail to come after himThere was a nightwatchman.
Which was unnecessary as Stokes was able to face the one remaining over after Bell was dismissed.There was a nightwatchman.
I disagree with the concept of a nightwatchman in the modern game but I guess that's fair enough.There was a nightwatchman.
Bumped it up a touch for you.Can you guys increase the volume? At maximum volume the commentary is loud enough but I would prefer it louder.
That's great now. Thanks.Bumped it up a touch for you.
Not sure, bowl well and it is hard to score and get in on. Bowl poorly and it is easy to put away. I think we have a decent score on the board given that WI will bat last on what is a dry pitch and it could be hard to bat on on days 4 and 5.Yeah, it's a real shame that one.
I wonder what a good score is on this pitch. People were saying 325 yesterday, but that strikes me as on the low side.
Was before the new ball was taken, resets after it is.Cricinfo reckon WI have only used one of their reviews, but I thought there was one yesterday as well. Maybe against Root? iirc it remained umpires call due to only clipping the leg stump.