• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jonbrooks chucking Megathread

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Except in Australia where he got hammered to kingdom come. He got so upset he snatched his cap of the umpire and flipped the crowd the bird! Yes, superb ambassador.

Murali reprimanded for reaction to crowd taunts - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
flipping the bird at australians is a bad thing how?
Flipping the bird to an Australian crowd is a rite of passage for ATGs, and Kohli paid homage to that in his first tour itself. Even Sachin wanted to do it, but was regretfully checked in his noble endeavor by the dastardly Shastri.
 

Sarun

U19 Debutant
Sorry didn't realise I needed to spell everything out for you.

I have no problem with a peer review, why would I.

Does UWA have the right to demand that the ICC reveal its protocols and let them review their system, no they don't why should they have the right to make demands on the ICC.

Can the cricket boards ask the ICC to publish their protocols, yes but they haven't, why because they accept what is happening.

Last week UWA claimed that the ICC (Bris Uni) was using UWA's testing protocols, this week they claim that the ICC (Bris Uni) have got it wrong, no evidence mind you just a shot in the dark in the hope they can cause a stir.
Do you even understand what peer reviews are?:laugh:
 

TNT

Banned
What now, we want the names and addresses of the highly-credentialed biomechanists associated with five different tertiary institutions.


Regarding the "accusations made by a UWA representative that the ICC has not subjected its testing protocol to peer scrutiny", the ICC said it had provided its protocol to "a number of highly-credentialed biomechanists associated with five different tertiary institutions across the world" but not to the UWA, since it had ended its relationship with the ICC, or to "third parties that have approached the ICC to obtain the testing protocol on behalf of UWA"
ICC news : ICC rebuts UWA, backs new testing methods | Cricket News | Cricinfo ICC Site | ESPN Cricinfo
 

Migara

International Coach
ICC does not reveal the names however. still fail by ICC. MakeIit peer reviewable so others could crtisize/develop the tecnique. pproviding it to five no names don't make any change.
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
What now, we want the names and addresses of the highly-credentialed biomechanists associated with five different tertiary institutions.
Please don't try and make it out as if you had been talking about this all along.

Good news, by the way.
 

TNT

Banned
Please don't try and make it out as if you had been talking about this all along.

Good news, by the way.
I haven't tried to make out anything, but I do know now that the posters that were wrong will only try to find something else to try and justify their stance. I wont be commenting any further because it was just the UWA making fools of themselves and the ICC have justified their actions. The only thing left is for those that were wrong to try and clean some of the egg off their faces.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
What now, we want the names and addresses of the highly-credentialed biomechanists associated with five different tertiary institutions.
According to a number of women associated with five different tertiary institutions accross the world who will name unnamed, I am the best at *** on earth. I'm not going to tell you their names but you have to believe me because I said so.

this means absolutely nothing. It's not peer review if you choose who reviews it and then don't reveal who they actually are.
 

uvelocity

International Coach
According to a number of women associated with five different tertiary institutions accross the world who will name unnamed, I am the best at *** on earth. I'm not going to tell you their names but you have to believe me because I said so.

this means absolutely nothing. It's not peer review if you choose who reviews it and then don't reveal who they actually are.
i find this very hard to believe
 

cricketrulez

Cricket Spectator
Funny, where was all this call for transparency in the use of CRAPEYE. It was being shoved down peoples throat with very little to no proof that it works. After 5 goddamn years where still no test results.

Now the wankers getting their panties twisted in a knot over "measurement" of elbow extension when they had no issue over "prediction" of ball path by CRAPEYE within 5mm!

Peer review for elbow extension measurement! LMAO! Hypocrisy at its best!
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I didn't know UDRS was not peer-reviewed. Are you sure? If it wasn't, then that too was not correct. And two wrongs don't make a right.
 

jonbrooks

International Debutant
How long before Tharindu Kaushal is reported?

The majority of his deliveries look ok but there does appear to be the odd chuck amongst them.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Oh hey it's that guy who has a weird obsession with chucking.
At least BoyBrumby is entertaining when he has an agenda; I can't wait until a panda debuts in Test cricket and bowls some dodgy-looking offies, just for his reaction.

TBH I did see a bit of a kink in Kaushal's action. Not large in the scheme of things, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did get reported.
 

Top