No one cares though.I think Jon Brooks raises a very valid point tbh.
Don't pretend you don't care. You're always sniffing around waiting to comment on my CC activity. Just desperate for some Sledger CC action imo.No one cares though.
As Hendrix said though, he doesn't actually say anything as bluntly as the headline suggests.Mind you it would be awesome if this was a troll by Murali just for the lols
Cos science has never been wrong before? F***ing flat planet.No real excuse for the original post, but as a kiwi he's probably spent his whole cricketing life listening to Bryan Waddle's close-minded "I know what I see and no science will make me think otherwise" views on the radio repeated ad infinitum, so getting some balance isn't easy....
More cos if science is wrong, then that has to be proven scientifically if you want to be taken seriouslyCos science has never been wrong before? F***ing flat planet.
Why am I trolling? In light of all the recent reports of chucking it would be fair to say Muralitharan got away with it.This is just trolling by the OP at this point.
Murali hasn't said anything controversial whatsoever. His deliveries were shown to be within the 15 degree threshold, Ajmal's were nearly 3 times that.
No hope in hell mate.take a hike jonbrooks
The brace tests merely showed that Muralitharan was capable of bowling legally. In no way does it prove he wasn't a chucker. There is a difference between a flawed action and someone who chucks the ball deliberately.im clear on murali not straightening, the video with the brace sold me - but i wonder with the worse set of numbers coming out on current dodgy bowlers compared to previous tests, how does the testing murali did relate to the most recent batch.